⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Abhishek Sharma vs David Warner — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Abhishek Sharma (India) has 1,438 T20I runs at avg 33.4 in 46 matches. David Warner (Australia) has 3,254 T20I runs at avg 33.2 in 108 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Abhishek Sharma vs David Warner — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Abhishek Sharma | David Warner |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 0 |
| Avg fantasy points | 71 | 0 |
| Best fantasy score | 282 | 0 |
| Runs | 688 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 201.8 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 69 | 0 |
| Sixes | 46 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 135 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 9.00 | 0.00 |
| Catches | 12 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 12 | 0 |
| Statistic | Abhishek Sharma | David Warner |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 46 | 108 |
| Runs | 1438 | 3254 |
| Batting average | 33.44 | 33.20 |
| Strike rate | 190.5 | 142.8 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 10 | 28 |
| Wickets | 7 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 34.14 | — |
| Economy rate | 8.69 | — |
Abhishek Sharma vs David Warner — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Abhishek Sharma has scored 1,438 T20I runs in 46 matches at an average of 33.44, with 2 centuries. He has also taken 7 T20I wickets at an average of 34.14 with an economy of 8.69.
T20I career: David Warner has scored 3,254 T20I runs in 108 matches at an average of 33.20, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Abhishek Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 71 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.