⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Adam Zampa vs Ben Stokes — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Adam Zampa (Australia) has 70 T20I runs at avg 4.7 in 113 matches. Ben Stokes (England) has 576 T20I runs at avg 23.0 in 41 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Adam Zampa vs Ben Stokes — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Adam Zampa | Ben Stokes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 2 |
| Avg fantasy points | 37 | 135 |
| Best fantasy score | 54 | 231 |
| Runs | 10 | 57 |
| Strike rate | 41.7 | 72.2 |
| Fours | 0 | 5 |
| Sixes | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 10 | 45 |
| Wickets | 1 | 7 |
| Economy rate | 3.62 | 2.89 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 6 |
| Catches | 1 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 1 | 0 |
| Statistic | Adam Zampa | Ben Stokes |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 113 | 41 |
| Runs | 70 | 576 |
| Batting average | 4.67 | 23.04 |
| Strike rate | 77.8 | 129.4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 1 |
| Wickets | 143 | 23 |
| Bowling average | 20.87 | 35.17 |
| Economy rate | 7.40 | 8.52 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
Adam Zampa vs Ben Stokes — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Adam Zampa has scored 70 T20I runs in 113 matches at an average of 4.67. He has also taken 143 T20I wickets at an average of 20.87 with an economy of 7.40.
T20I career: Ben Stokes has scored 576 T20I runs in 41 matches at an average of 23.04, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 23 T20I wickets at an average of 35.17 with an economy of 8.52.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Stokes is the stronger pick with an average of 135 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.