⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Aiden Markram vs Axar Patel — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Aiden Markram (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,938 T20I runs at avg 31.8 in 75 matches. Axar Patel (India) has 690 T20I runs at avg 18.6 in 90 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Aiden Markram vs Axar Patel — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Aiden Markram | Axar Patel |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 12 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 40 | 46 |
| Best fantasy score | 89 | 134 |
| Runs | 231 | 221 |
| Strike rate | 138.3 | 121.4 |
| Fours | 20 | 18 |
| Sixes | 11 | 7 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 45 | 56 |
| Wickets | 0 | 17 |
| Economy rate | 13.67 | 8.72 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 4 |
| Catches | 8 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 9 | 9 |
| Statistic | Aiden Markram | Axar Patel |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 75 | 90 |
| Runs | 1938 | 690 |
| Batting average | 31.77 | 18.65 |
| Strike rate | 148.7 | 133.2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 14 | 1 |
| Wickets | 16 | 92 |
| Bowling average | 36.81 | 21.73 |
| Economy rate | 8.79 | 7.52 |
Aiden Markram vs Axar Patel — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Aiden Markram has scored 1,938 T20I runs in 75 matches at an average of 31.77, with 14 half-centuries. He has also taken 16 T20I wickets at an average of 36.81 with an economy of 8.79.
T20I career: Axar Patel has scored 690 T20I runs in 90 matches at an average of 18.65, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 92 T20I wickets at an average of 21.73 with an economy of 7.52.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Axar Patel is the stronger pick with an average of 46 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.