⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ajinkya Rahane vs Josh Hazlewood — IPL 2026 Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ajinkya Rahane (Kolkata Knight Riders) averages 44 fantasy pts per match. Josh Hazlewood (Royal Challengers Bengaluru) averages 56 fantasy pts. Full IPL stats & fantasy cricket comparison: batting, bowling, fielding, and form.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ajinkya Rahane vs Josh Hazlewood — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ajinkya Rahane | Josh Hazlewood |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 14 | 14 |
| Avg fantasy points | 44 | 56 |
| Best fantasy score | 120 | 223 |
| Runs | 335 | 4 |
| Strike rate | 135.1 | 33.3 |
| Fours | 25 | 0 |
| Sixes | 18 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 67 | 4 |
| Wickets | 0 | 22 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 7.13 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 7 |
| Catches | 7 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 7 | 8 |
| Statistic | Ajinkya Rahane | Josh Hazlewood |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 58 |
| Runs | 375 | 24 |
| Batting average | 20.83 | 8.00 |
| Strike rate | 113.3 | 114.3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 77 |
| Bowling average | — | 20.94 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.41 |
Ajinkya Rahane vs Josh Hazlewood — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ajinkya Rahane has scored 375 T20I runs in 20 matches at an average of 20.83, with 1 half-century.
T20I career: Josh Hazlewood has scored 24 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 8.00. He has also taken 77 T20I wickets at an average of 20.94 with an economy of 7.41.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Josh Hazlewood is the stronger pick with an average of 56 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.