⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Arshdeep Singh vs Shivam Dube — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Arshdeep Singh (India) has 101 T20I runs at avg 6.3 in 86 matches. Shivam Dube (India) has 4,213 T20I runs at avg 34.0 in 138 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Arshdeep Singh vs Shivam Dube — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Arshdeep Singh | Shivam Dube |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 46 | 44 |
| Best fantasy score | 125 | 93 |
| Runs | 45 | 317 |
| Strike rate | 121.6 | 147.4 |
| Fours | 3 | 25 |
| Sixes | 1 | 16 |
| Highest score | 15 | 47 |
| Wickets | 24 | 9 |
| Economy rate | 8.53 | 7.68 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 2 |
| Catches | 7 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 8 | 6 |
| Statistic | Arshdeep Singh | Shivam Dube |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 86 | 138 |
| Runs | 101 | 4213 |
| Batting average | 6.31 | 33.98 |
| Strike rate | 99.0 | 159.8 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 28 |
| Wickets | 129 | 37 |
| Bowling average | 20.13 | 24.86 |
| Economy rate | 8.63 | 9.68 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
Arshdeep Singh vs Shivam Dube — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Arshdeep Singh has scored 101 T20I runs in 86 matches at an average of 6.31. He has also taken 129 T20I wickets at an average of 20.13 with an economy of 8.63.
T20I career: Shivam Dube has scored 4,213 T20I runs in 138 matches at an average of 33.98, with 4 centuries. He has also taken 37 T20I wickets at an average of 24.86 with an economy of 9.68.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Arshdeep Singh is the stronger pick with an average of 46 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.