⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Babar Azam vs Josh Hazlewood — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Babar Azam (Pakistan) has 4,545 T20I runs at avg 39.2 in 142 matches. Josh Hazlewood (Royal Challengers Bengaluru) has 24 T20I runs at avg 8.0 in 58 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Babar Azam vs Josh Hazlewood — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Babar Azam | Josh Hazlewood |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 3 | 13 |
| Avg fantasy points | 58 | 44 |
| Best fantasy score | 99 | 156 |
| Runs | 125 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 64.4 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 9 | 0 |
| Sixes | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 69 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 15 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 9.59 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 4 |
| Catches | 2 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 8 |
| Statistic | Babar Azam | Josh Hazlewood |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 142 | 58 |
| Runs | 4545 | 24 |
| Batting average | 39.18 | 8.00 |
| Strike rate | 128.3 | 114.3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 3 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 38 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 77 |
| Bowling average | — | 20.94 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.41 |
Babar Azam vs Josh Hazlewood — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Babar Azam has scored 4,545 T20I runs in 142 matches at an average of 39.18, with 3 centuries.
T20I career: Josh Hazlewood has scored 24 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 8.00. He has also taken 77 T20I wickets at an average of 20.94 with an economy of 7.41.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Babar Azam is the stronger pick with an average of 58 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.