⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ben Stokes vs Mohammed Shami — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ben Stokes (England) has 576 T20I runs at avg 23.0 in 41 matches. Mohammed Shami (Lucknow Super Giants) has 10 T20I runs at avg 5.0 in 31 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ben Stokes vs Mohammed Shami — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Mohammed Shami |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 13 |
| Avg fantasy points | 135 | 35 |
| Best fantasy score | 231 | 91 |
| Runs | 57 | 31 |
| Strike rate | 72.2 | 140.9 |
| Fours | 5 | 2 |
| Sixes | 2 | 3 |
| Highest score | 45 | 12 |
| Wickets | 7 | 12 |
| Economy rate | 2.89 | 9.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 6 | 2 |
| Catches | 0 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 3 |
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Mohammed Shami |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 41 | 31 |
| Runs | 576 | 10 |
| Batting average | 23.04 | 5.00 |
| Strike rate | 129.4 | 58.8 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 0 |
| Wickets | 23 | 30 |
| Bowling average | 35.17 | 30.47 |
| Economy rate | 8.52 | 8.79 |
Ben Stokes vs Mohammed Shami — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ben Stokes has scored 576 T20I runs in 41 matches at an average of 23.04, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 23 T20I wickets at an average of 35.17 with an economy of 8.52.
T20I career: Mohammed Shami has scored 10 T20I runs in 31 matches at an average of 5.00. He has also taken 30 T20I wickets at an average of 30.47 with an economy of 8.79.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Stokes is the stronger pick with an average of 135 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.