⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ben Stokes vs Ryan Rickelton — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ben Stokes (England) has 576 T20I runs at avg 23.0 in 41 matches. Ryan Rickelton (Mumbai Indians) has 680 T20I runs at avg 27.2 in 28 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ben Stokes vs Ryan Rickelton — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Ryan Rickelton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 12 |
| Avg fantasy points | 135 | 76 |
| Best fantasy score | 231 | 217 |
| Runs | 57 | 448 |
| Strike rate | 72.2 | 186.7 |
| Fours | 5 | 31 |
| Sixes | 2 | 38 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 45 | 123 |
| Wickets | 7 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 2.89 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 6 | 0 |
| Catches | 0 | 7 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 7 |
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Ryan Rickelton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 41 | 28 |
| Runs | 576 | 680 |
| Batting average | 23.04 | 27.20 |
| Strike rate | 129.4 | 146.2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 3 |
| Wickets | 23 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 35.17 | — |
| Economy rate | 8.52 | — |
Ben Stokes vs Ryan Rickelton — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ben Stokes has scored 576 T20I runs in 41 matches at an average of 23.04, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 23 T20I wickets at an average of 35.17 with an economy of 8.52.
T20I career: Ryan Rickelton has scored 680 T20I runs in 28 matches at an average of 27.20, with 3 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Stokes is the stronger pick with an average of 135 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.