⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ben Stokes vs Shadab Khan — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ben Stokes (England) has 576 T20I runs at avg 23.0 in 41 matches. Shadab Khan (Pakistan) has 904 T20I runs at avg 18.8 in 118 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ben Stokes vs Shadab Khan — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Shadab Khan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Avg fantasy points | 135 | 64 |
| Best fantasy score | 231 | 95 |
| Runs | 57 | 100 |
| Strike rate | 72.2 | 68.5 |
| Fours | 5 | 3 |
| Sixes | 2 | 3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 45 | 71 |
| Wickets | 7 | 2 |
| Economy rate | 2.89 | 5.31 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 6 | 2 |
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Shadab Khan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 41 | 118 |
| Runs | 576 | 904 |
| Batting average | 23.04 | 18.83 |
| Strike rate | 129.4 | 146.8 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 1 |
| Wickets | 23 | 118 |
| Bowling average | 35.17 | 24.49 |
| Economy rate | 8.52 | 7.50 |
Ben Stokes vs Shadab Khan — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ben Stokes has scored 576 T20I runs in 41 matches at an average of 23.04, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 23 T20I wickets at an average of 35.17 with an economy of 8.52.
T20I career: Shadab Khan has scored 904 T20I runs in 118 matches at an average of 18.83, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 118 T20I wickets at an average of 24.49 with an economy of 7.50.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Stokes is the stronger pick with an average of 135 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.