⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Cooper Connolly vs Shakib Al Hasan — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Cooper Connolly (Punjab Kings) has 28 T20I runs at avg 4.7 in 11 matches. Shakib Al Hasan (Bangladesh) has 2,295 T20I runs at avg 23.7 in 113 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Cooper Connolly vs Shakib Al Hasan — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Cooper Connolly | Shakib Al Hasan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 14 | 3 |
| Avg fantasy points | 66 | 47 |
| Best fantasy score | 195 | 52 |
| Runs | 484 | 98 |
| Strike rate | 157.1 | 78.4 |
| Fours | 41 | 13 |
| Sixes | 32 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 107 | 38 |
| Catches | 3 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 0 |
| Statistic | Cooper Connolly | Shakib Al Hasan |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 113 |
| Runs | 28 | 2295 |
| Batting average | 4.67 | 23.66 |
| Strike rate | 93.3 | 122.5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 12 |
| Wickets | 3 | 131 |
| Bowling average | 77.00 | 20.95 |
| Economy rate | 9.24 | 6.92 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 0 | 2 |
Cooper Connolly vs Shakib Al Hasan — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Cooper Connolly has scored 28 T20I runs in 11 matches at an average of 4.67. He has also taken 3 T20I wickets at an average of 77.00 with an economy of 9.24.
T20I career: Shakib Al Hasan has scored 2,295 T20I runs in 113 matches at an average of 23.66, with 12 half-centuries. He has also taken 131 T20I wickets at an average of 20.95 with an economy of 6.92.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Cooper Connolly is the stronger pick with an average of 66 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.