⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Deepti Sharma vs Jemimah Rodrigues — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Deepti Sharma (India Women) has 2,109 T20I runs at avg 42.2 in 135 matches. Jemimah Rodrigues (India Women) has 2,365 T20I runs at avg 27.2 in 89 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Deepti Sharma vs Jemimah Rodrigues — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Deepti Sharma | Jemimah Rodrigues |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 9 | 9 |
| Avg fantasy points | 68 | 49 |
| Best fantasy score | 218 | 127 |
| Runs | 183 | 229 |
| Strike rate | 93.4 | 121.8 |
| Fours | 21 | 26 |
| Sixes | 1 | 3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 1 |
| Highest score | 67 | 69 |
| Wickets | 9 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 6.11 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 5 | 0 |
| Catches | 2 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 8 |
| Statistic | Deepti Sharma | Jemimah Rodrigues |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 135 | 89 |
| Runs | 2109 | 2365 |
| Batting average | 42.18 | 27.18 |
| Strike rate | 195.6 | 106.5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 15 |
| Wickets | 171 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 17.73 | — |
| Economy rate | 6.28 | 5.56 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
Deepti Sharma vs Jemimah Rodrigues — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Deepti Sharma has scored 2,109 T20I runs in 135 matches at an average of 42.18, with 2 half-centuries. She has also taken 171 T20I wickets at an average of 17.73 with an economy of 6.28.
T20I career: Jemimah Rodrigues has scored 2,365 T20I runs in 89 matches at an average of 27.18, with 15 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Deepti Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 68 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.