⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Hardik Pandya vs Sam Curran — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Hardik Pandya (Mumbai Indians) has 2,221 T20I runs at avg 27.8 in 136 matches. Sam Curran (England) has 696 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 74 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Hardik Pandya vs Sam Curran — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Hardik Pandya | Sam Curran |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 8 |
| Avg fantasy points | 43 | 77 |
| Best fantasy score | 87 | 163 |
| Runs | 194 | 219 |
| Strike rate | 136.6 | 93.6 |
| Fours | 19 | 21 |
| Sixes | 7 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 34 | 111 |
| Wickets | 4 | 7 |
| Economy rate | 11.41 | 7.87 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 3 |
| Catches | 2 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 4 |
| Statistic | Hardik Pandya | Sam Curran |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 136 | 74 |
| Runs | 2221 | 696 |
| Batting average | 27.76 | 20.47 |
| Strike rate | 145.1 | 127.9 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 9 | 2 |
| Wickets | 114 | 61 |
| Bowling average | 26.82 | 30.11 |
| Economy rate | 8.33 | 8.84 |
Hardik Pandya vs Sam Curran — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Hardik Pandya has scored 2,221 T20I runs in 136 matches at an average of 27.76, with 9 half-centuries. He has also taken 114 T20I wickets at an average of 26.82 with an economy of 8.33.
T20I career: Sam Curran has scored 696 T20I runs in 74 matches at an average of 20.47, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 61 T20I wickets at an average of 30.11 with an economy of 8.84.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Sam Curran is the stronger pick with an average of 77 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.