⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Heather Knight vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Heather Knight (England Women) has 3,989 T20I runs at avg 48.6 in 139 matches. Nat Sciver-Brunt (England Women) has 3,256 T20I runs at avg 34.3 in 120 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Heather Knight vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Heather Knight | Nat Sciver-Brunt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 5 |
| Avg fantasy points | 44 | 88 |
| Best fantasy score | 114 | 145 |
| Runs | 282 | 282 |
| Strike rate | 108.5 | 104.8 |
| Fours | 35 | 32 |
| Sixes | 1 | 3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 3 |
| Highest score | 70 | 75 |
| Catches | 6 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 6 | 3 |
| Statistic | Heather Knight | Nat Sciver-Brunt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 139 | 120 |
| Runs | 3989 | 3256 |
| Batting average | 48.65 | 34.27 |
| Strike rate | 213.2 | 138.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 8 | 18 |
| Wickets | 0 | 88 |
| Bowling average | — | 22.13 |
| Economy rate | 6.19 | 6.62 |
Heather Knight vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Heather Knight has scored 3,989 T20I runs in 139 matches at an average of 48.65, with 1 century.
T20I career: Nat Sciver-Brunt has scored 3,256 T20I runs in 120 matches at an average of 34.27, with 18 half-centuries. She has also taken 88 T20I wickets at an average of 22.13 with an economy of 6.62.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Nat Sciver-Brunt is the stronger pick with an average of 88 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.