⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Joe Root vs Suryakumar Yadav — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Joe Root (England) has 881 T20I runs at avg 36.7 in 31 matches. Suryakumar Yadav (Mumbai Indians) has 3,220 T20I runs at avg 36.6 in 110 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Joe Root vs Suryakumar Yadav — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Joe Root | Suryakumar Yadav |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 13 |
| Avg fantasy points | 88 | 40 |
| Best fantasy score | 161 | 101 |
| Runs | 130 | 269 |
| Strike rate | 58.8 | 147.0 |
| Fours | 17 | 28 |
| Sixes | 0 | 10 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 121 | 60 |
| Economy rate | 5.29 | 0.00 |
| Catches | 1 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 1 | 3 |
| Statistic | Joe Root | Suryakumar Yadav |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 31 | 110 |
| Runs | 881 | 3220 |
| Batting average | 36.71 | 36.59 |
| Strike rate | 126.0 | 162.6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 24 |
| Wickets | 6 | 2 |
| Bowling average | 23.17 | 2.50 |
| Economy rate | 9.93 | 5.00 |
Joe Root vs Suryakumar Yadav — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Joe Root has scored 881 T20I runs in 31 matches at an average of 36.71, with 5 half-centuries. He has also taken 6 T20I wickets at an average of 23.17 with an economy of 9.93.
T20I career: Suryakumar Yadav has scored 3,220 T20I runs in 110 matches at an average of 36.59, with 4 centuries. He has also taken 2 T20I wickets at an average of 2.50 with an economy of 5.00.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Joe Root is the stronger pick with an average of 88 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.