⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Kagiso Rabada vs Yashasvi Jaiswal — IPL 2026 Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Kagiso Rabada (Gujarat Titans) averages 61 fantasy pts per match. Yashasvi Jaiswal (Rajasthan Royals) averages 54 fantasy pts. Full IPL stats & fantasy cricket comparison: batting, bowling, fielding, and form.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Kagiso Rabada vs Yashasvi Jaiswal — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Kagiso Rabada | Yashasvi Jaiswal |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 61 | 54 |
| Best fantasy score | 130 | 169 |
| Runs | 47 | 565 |
| Strike rate | 123.7 | 138.8 |
| Fours | 5 | 72 |
| Sixes | 2 | 21 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 23 | 110 |
| Wickets | 29 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 9.68 | 3.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 0 |
| Catches | 7 | 4 |
| Total dismissals | 7 | 5 |
| Statistic | Kagiso Rabada | Yashasvi Jaiswal |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 76 | 20 |
| Runs | 184 | 651 |
| Batting average | 14.15 | 36.17 |
| Strike rate | 115.7 | 162.8 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 4 |
| Wickets | 78 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 29.35 | — |
| Economy rate | 8.41 | 11.00 |
Kagiso Rabada vs Yashasvi Jaiswal — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Kagiso Rabada has scored 184 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 14.15. He has also taken 78 T20I wickets at an average of 29.35 with an economy of 8.41.
T20I career: Yashasvi Jaiswal has scored 651 T20I runs in 20 matches at an average of 36.17, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Kagiso Rabada is the stronger pick with an average of 61 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.