⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
KL Rahul vs Mitchell Starc — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
KL Rahul (India) has 2,149 T20I runs at avg 36.4 in 69 matches. Mitchell Starc (Delhi Capitals) has 98 T20I runs at avg 9.8 in 65 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
KL Rahul vs Mitchell Starc — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | KL Rahul | Mitchell Starc |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 6 |
| Avg fantasy points | 78 | 65 |
| Best fantasy score | 287 | 154 |
| Runs | 732 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 139.4 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 71 | 0 |
| Sixes | 34 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 152 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 11 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 10.18 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 4 |
| Catches | 3 | 4 |
| Total dismissals | 5 | 5 |
| Statistic | KL Rahul | Mitchell Starc |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 69 | 65 |
| Runs | 2149 | 98 |
| Batting average | 36.42 | 9.80 |
| Strike rate | 139.2 | 98.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 20 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 79 |
| Bowling average | — | 23.81 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.74 |
KL Rahul vs Mitchell Starc — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: KL Rahul has scored 2,149 T20I runs in 69 matches at an average of 36.42, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Mitchell Starc has scored 98 T20I runs in 65 matches at an average of 9.80. He has also taken 79 T20I wickets at an average of 23.81 with an economy of 7.74.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, KL Rahul is the stronger pick with an average of 78 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.