⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD

Marcus Stoinis vs Steve SmithInternational Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison

Marcus Stoinis (Punjab Kings) has 1,388 T20I runs at avg 31.6 in 85 matches. Steve Smith (Australia) has 1,090 T20I runs at avg 25.4 in 66 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.

Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form

TweetWhatsApp
PLAYER 1
🏏
Marcus Stoinis
🦁 PBKS · 8.5 cr
VS
PLAYER 2
🏏
Steve Smith
🇦🇺 AUS · 10 cr
🏏
Marcus Stoinis
🦁 Punjab Kings
AR🌏 OS
8.5 cr
Credits
39
Avg Pts
121
Best FP
54.7
Pts/Cr
216
Total Runs
2
Total Wkts
🏏
Steve Smith
🇦🇺 Australia
BAT🌏 OS
10 cr
Credits
0
Avg Pts
0
Best FP
0.0
Pts/Cr
0
Total Runs
0
Total Wkts
⚠️These players are from different series — comparing all-time stats. For fairest comparison, pick two players from the same competition.
🔥 Clear Pick
🏏 Marcus Stoinis
39 higher avg pts · 121 best fantasy score
🏏 Marcus Stoinis
VS
🏏 Steve Smith
T20I Career Overview
85Matches66
🏏 Batting
1388Runs1090
31.55Batting Avg25.35
148.93Strike Rate125.58
0Centuries0
6Half-Centuries5
64Sixes 🔴26
78
Best Score
90
🎳 Bowling
52Wickets17
24.85Bowling Avg22.18
8.80Economy Rate7.77
05-Wkt Hauls0
4/23
Best Figures
3/20
Source: Cricsheet (cricsheet.org, CC BY 4.0) · International matches only

Marcus Stoinis vs Steve Smith — Stat Comparison Table

Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).

IPL season stats
StatisticMarcus StoinisSteve Smith
Matches120
Avg fantasy points390
Best fantasy score1210
Runs2160
Strike rate180.00.0
Fours230
Sixes110
Half-centuries (50+)10
Highest score620
Wickets20
Economy rate12.560.00
Best spell (wkts)10
Catches10
Total dismissals20
International career — T20I
StatisticMarcus StoinisSteve Smith
Matches8566
Runs13881090
Batting average31.5525.35
Strike rate148.9125.6
Half-centuries (50+)65
Wickets5217
Bowling average24.8522.18
Economy rate8.807.77
Stats updated
⚡ Strengths & Captaincy Pick
🏏 Marcus Stoinis
Superior run-scorer
Higher strike rate
More big-hitting sixes
More wickets
Higher avg fantasy pts
🏏 Steve Smith
Evenly matched
👑 Captaincy Recommendation
C: 🏏 Marcus Stoinis
39 avg pts · 121 best · 0 MOTM
VC: 🏏 Steve Smith
Captaining Marcus Stoinis gives you 2× pts. Always verify playing XI before locking.
📝 T20I Career Comparison

Marcus Stoinis vs Steve SmithT20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.

T20I career: Marcus Stoinis has scored 1,388 T20I runs in 85 matches at an average of 31.55, with 6 half-centuries. He has also taken 52 T20I wickets at an average of 24.85 with an economy of 8.80.

T20I career: Steve Smith has scored 1,090 T20I runs in 66 matches at an average of 25.35, with 5 half-centuries. He has also taken 17 T20I wickets at an average of 22.18 with an economy of 7.77.

Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Marcus Stoinis is the stronger pick with an average of 39 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.

Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions
READY TO PLAY?
Pick Stoinis & Smith in your fantasy XI
Free to play · No prize pool · Just bragging rights
Build XI →

Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.

CricketDreamCRICKETDREAM FANTASY
© 2026 CricketDream · Fantasy Cricket Platform · Built for cricket fans
Disclaimer: This platform is intended for users aged 18 years and above only. CricketDream is a free, skill-based fantasy cricket platform for entertainment purposes only. No monetary transactions or prizes are involved. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by, or sponsored by the BCCI, the IPL, any IPL franchise, or any other cricket governing body. All team names, player names, and logos are property of their respective owners.
⚽ ALSO INTO FOOTBALL?
Play Fantasy Football, Draft & Predictor — on FootballDream.in
🎯 Predictor📋 Team Draft👤 Player Draft
Play Now → footballdream.in