⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ravindra Jadeja vs Steve Smith — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ravindra Jadeja (Rajasthan Royals) has 508 T20I runs at avg 22.1 in 71 matches. Steve Smith (Australia) has 1,090 T20I runs at avg 25.4 in 66 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ravindra Jadeja vs Steve Smith — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ravindra Jadeja | Steve Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 13 | 0 |
| Avg fantasy points | 54 | 0 |
| Best fantasy score | 105 | 0 |
| Runs | 266 | 0 |
| Strike rate | 135.0 | 0.0 |
| Fours | 24 | 0 |
| Sixes | 5 | 0 |
| Highest score | 45 | 0 |
| Wickets | 10 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.64 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 0 |
| Catches | 2 | 0 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 0 |
| Statistic | Ravindra Jadeja | Steve Smith |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 71 | 66 |
| Runs | 508 | 1090 |
| Batting average | 22.09 | 25.35 |
| Strike rate | 127.0 | 125.6 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Wickets | 51 | 17 |
| Bowling average | 30.55 | 22.18 |
| Economy rate | 7.21 | 7.77 |
Ravindra Jadeja vs Steve Smith — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ravindra Jadeja has scored 508 T20I runs in 71 matches at an average of 22.09. He has also taken 51 T20I wickets at an average of 30.55 with an economy of 7.21.
T20I career: Steve Smith has scored 1,090 T20I runs in 66 matches at an average of 25.35, with 5 half-centuries. He has also taken 17 T20I wickets at an average of 22.18 with an economy of 7.77.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ravindra Jadeja is the stronger pick with an average of 54 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.