⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Rovman Powell vs Shivam Dube — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rovman Powell (Kolkata Knight Riders) has 2,233 T20I runs at avg 26.0 in 113 matches. Shivam Dube (India) has 857 T20I runs at avg 28.6 in 58 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Rovman Powell vs Shivam Dube — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Rovman Powell | Shivam Dube |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 13 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 38 | 45 |
| Best fantasy score | 73 | 93 |
| Runs | 258 | 394 |
| Strike rate | 138.0 | 151.0 |
| Fours | 21 | 33 |
| Sixes | 15 | 19 |
| Highest score | 43 | 47 |
| Wickets | 0 | 7 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 9.05 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 8 | 4 |
| Total dismissals | 8 | 4 |
| Statistic | Rovman Powell | Shivam Dube |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 113 | 58 |
| Runs | 2233 | 857 |
| Batting average | 25.97 | 28.57 |
| Strike rate | 141.8 | 153.6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 10 | 4 |
| Wickets | 4 | 28 |
| Bowling average | 49.25 | 27.86 |
| Economy rate | 10.46 | 9.83 |
Rovman Powell vs Shivam Dube — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Rovman Powell has scored 2,233 T20I runs in 113 matches at an average of 25.97, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 49.25 with an economy of 10.46.
T20I career: Shivam Dube has scored 857 T20I runs in 58 matches at an average of 28.57, with 4 half-centuries. He has also taken 28 T20I wickets at an average of 27.86 with an economy of 9.83.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shivam Dube is the stronger pick with an average of 45 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.