⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD

Trent Boult vs Washington SundarInternational Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison

Trent Boult (Mumbai Indians) has 55 T20I runs at avg 7.9 in 59 matches. Washington Sundar (India) has 265 T20I runs at avg 16.6 in 55 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.

Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form

TweetWhatsApp
PLAYER 1
🏏
Trent Boult
🔵 MI · 8.5 cr
VS
PLAYER 2
🏏
Washington Sundar
🇮🇳 IND · 8.5 cr
🏏
Trent Boult
🔵 Mumbai Indians
BOWL🌏 OS
8.5 cr
Credits
22
Avg Pts
54
Best FP
15.5
Pts/Cr
8
Total Runs
3
Total Wkts
🏏
Washington Sundar
🇮🇳 India
AR
8.5 cr
Credits
45
Avg Pts
223
Best FP
141.5
Pts/Cr
381
Total Runs
6
Total Wkts
⚠️These players are from different series — comparing all-time stats. For fairest comparison, pick two players from the same competition.
🔥 Clear Pick
🏏 Washington Sundar
23 higher avg pts · 223 best fantasy score
🏏 Trent Boult
VS
🏏 Washington Sundar
T20I Career Overview
59Matches55
🏏 Batting
55Runs265
7.86Batting Avg16.56
96.49Strike Rate132.50
0Centuries0
0Half-Centuries1
2Sixes 🔴14
16
Best Score
50
🎳 Bowling
78Wickets50
22.31Bowling Avg22.50
7.79Economy Rate6.93
05-Wkt Hauls0
4/13
Best Figures
3/3
Source: Cricsheet (cricsheet.org, CC BY 4.0) · International matches only

Trent Boult vs Washington Sundar — Stat Comparison Table

Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).

IPL season stats
StatisticTrent BoultWashington Sundar
Matches620
Avg fantasy points2245
Best fantasy score54223
Runs8381
Strike rate200.0111.1
Fours037
Sixes18
Half-centuries (50+)04
Highest score752
Wickets36
Economy rate10.514.92
Best spell (wkts)15
Catches15
Total dismissals25
International career — T20I
StatisticTrent BoultWashington Sundar
Matches5955
Runs55265
Batting average7.8616.56
Strike rate96.5132.5
Half-centuries (50+)01
Wickets7850
Bowling average22.3122.50
Economy rate7.796.93
Stats updated
⚡ Strengths & Captaincy Pick
🏏 Trent Boult
Higher strike rate
🏏 Washington Sundar
Superior run-scorer
More big-hitting sixes
More wickets
Better economy rate
Higher avg fantasy pts
👑 Captaincy Recommendation
C: 🏏 Washington Sundar
45 avg pts · 223 best · 0 MOTM
VC: 🏏 Trent Boult
Captaining Washington Sundar gives you 2× pts. Always verify playing XI before locking.
📝 T20I Career Comparison

Trent Boult vs Washington SundarT20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.

T20I career: Trent Boult has scored 55 T20I runs in 59 matches at an average of 7.86. He has also taken 78 T20I wickets at an average of 22.31 with an economy of 7.79.

T20I career: Washington Sundar has scored 265 T20I runs in 55 matches at an average of 16.56, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 50 T20I wickets at an average of 22.50 with an economy of 6.93.

Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Washington Sundar is the stronger pick with an average of 45 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.

Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions
READY TO PLAY?
Pick Boult & Sundar in your fantasy XI
Free to play · No prize pool · Just bragging rights
Build XI →

Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.

CricketDreamCRICKETDREAM FANTASY
© 2026 CricketDream · Fantasy Cricket Platform · Built for cricket fans
Disclaimer: This platform is intended for users aged 18 years and above only. CricketDream is a free, skill-based fantasy cricket platform for entertainment purposes only. No monetary transactions or prizes are involved. Not affiliated with, endorsed by, licensed by, or sponsored by the BCCI, the IPL, any IPL franchise, or any other cricket governing body. All team names, player names, and logos are property of their respective owners.
⚽ ALSO INTO FOOTBALL?
Play Fantasy Football, Draft & Predictor — on FootballDream.in
🎯 Predictor📋 Team Draft👤 Player Draft
Play Now → footballdream.in