⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ajinkya Rahane vs Kane Williamson — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Kane Williamson has the edge on the headline numbers: Kane Williamson leads on T20I batting (2,575 runs, avg 33.4). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Ajinkya Rahane (Kolkata Knight Riders) has 375 T20I runs at avg 20.8 in 20 matches. Kane Williamson (New Zealand) has 2,575 T20I runs at avg 33.4 in 93 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ajinkya Rahane vs Kane Williamson — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ajinkya Rahane | Kane Williamson |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 14 | 1 |
| Avg fantasy points | 44 | 69 |
| Best fantasy score | 120 | 69 |
| Runs | 335 | 18 |
| Strike rate | 135.1 | 47.4 |
| Fours | 25 | 2 |
| Sixes | 18 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 67 | 18 |
| Catches | 7 | 4 |
| Total dismissals | 7 | 4 |
| Statistic | Ajinkya Rahane | Kane Williamson |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 93 |
| Runs | 375 | 2575 |
| Batting average | 20.83 | 33.44 |
| Strike rate | 113.3 | 126.2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 18 |
| Wickets | 0 | 6 |
| Bowling average | — | 27.33 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.34 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Ajinkya Rahane has played 20 T20Is and Kane Williamson 93. Ajinkya Rahane has 375 runs at 20.8 (strike rate 113.3), against 2,575 at 33.4 (126.2) for Kane Williamson, so Kane Williamson has scored more. Kane Williamson also bowls: 6 wickets at an economy of 8.34, while Ajinkya Rahane has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Ajinkya Rahane has played 90 ODIs and Kane Williamson 175. Ajinkya Rahane has 2,962 runs at 35.3 (strike rate 80.0), against 7,256 at 48.7 (82.9) for Kane Williamson, so Kane Williamson has scored more. Hundreds: Ajinkya Rahane 3, Kane Williamson 15. Fifties: 24 and 47. Kane Williamson also bowls: 37 wickets at an economy of 5.36, while Ajinkya Rahane has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Ajinkya Rahane has played 85 Tests and Kane Williamson 110. Ajinkya Rahane has 5,077 runs at 38.5 (strike rate 49.7), against 9,515 at 54.1 (52.3) for Kane Williamson, so Kane Williamson has scored more. Hundreds: Ajinkya Rahane 12, Kane Williamson 33. Fifties: 26 and 38. Kane Williamson also bowls: 30 wickets at an economy of 3.37, while Ajinkya Rahane has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 4 June 2026.
Ajinkya Rahane vs Kane Williamson — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ajinkya Rahane has scored 375 T20I runs in 20 matches at an average of 20.83, with 1 half-century.
T20I career: Kane Williamson has scored 2,575 T20I runs in 93 matches at an average of 33.44, with 18 half-centuries. He has also taken 6 T20I wickets at an average of 27.33 with an economy of 8.34.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Kane Williamson is the stronger pick with an average of 69 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson?
Ajinkya Rahane vs Kane Williamson — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson?
What is the price difference between Ajinkya Rahane and Kane Williamson?
How many MOTM awards have Ajinkya Rahane and Kane Williamson won?
Should I pick Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Ajinkya Rahane or Kane Williamson — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.