⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Alana King vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Alana King (Australia Women) has 39 T20I runs at avg 13.0 in 34 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Alana King vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Alana King | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 17 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 46 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 174 | 214 |
| Runs | 46 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 100.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 3 | 85 |
| Sixes | 1 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 26 | 138 |
| Wickets | 18 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.93 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 5 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 9 |
| Statistic | Alana King | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 34 | 159 |
| Runs | 39 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 13.00 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 90.7 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 32 |
| Wickets | 34 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 18.03 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.37 | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Alana King has played 34 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Alana King has 39 runs at 13.0 (strike rate 90.7), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Alana King 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 0 and 32. With the ball, Alana King has 34 wickets at an economy of 6.37 and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Alana King has more wickets.
ODI. Alana King has played 53 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Alana King has 295 runs at 18.4 (strike rate 99.3), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Alana King 0, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 1 and 63. With the ball, Alana King has 85 wickets at an economy of 4.28 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Alana King has more wickets.
Test. Alana King has played 6 Tests and Rohit Sharma 67. Alana King has 74 runs at 10.6 (strike rate 39.6), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Alana King 0, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 0 and 18. With the ball, Alana King has 15 wickets at an economy of 2.72 and Rohit Sharma 2 at 3.51; Alana King has more wickets.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Alana King vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Alana King has scored 39 T20I runs in 34 matches at an average of 13.00. She has also taken 34 T20I wickets at an average of 18.03 with an economy of 6.37.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Alana King or Rohit Sharma?
Alana King vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Alana King or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Alana King and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Alana King and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Alana King or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Alana King or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more ODI runs, Alana King or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Alana King or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Alana King or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Alana King or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.