⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Albie Morkel vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Albie Morkel () has 572 T20I runs at avg 21.2 in 50 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Albie Morkel vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Albie Morkel | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 214 |
| Runs | 0 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 0 | 85 |
| Sixes | 0 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 138 |
| Catches | 0 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 9 |
| Statistic | Albie Morkel | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 50 | 159 |
| Runs | 572 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 21.19 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 142.3 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 32 |
| Wickets | 26 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 33.23 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 8.01 | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Albie Morkel has played 50 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Albie Morkel has 572 runs at 21.2 (strike rate 142.3), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Albie Morkel 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 0 and 32. With the ball, Albie Morkel has 26 wickets at an economy of 8.01 and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Albie Morkel has more wickets.
ODI. Albie Morkel has played 58 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Albie Morkel has 782 runs at 23.7 (strike rate 100.3), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Albie Morkel 0, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 2 and 63. With the ball, Albie Morkel has 50 wickets at an economy of 5.50 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Albie Morkel has more wickets while Rohit Sharma is more economical.
Test. Albie Morkel has played 1 Test and Rohit Sharma 67. Albie Morkel has 58 runs at 58.0 (strike rate 81.7), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Albie Morkel 0, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 1 and 18.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Albie Morkel vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Albie Morkel has scored 572 T20I runs in 50 matches at an average of 21.19. He has also taken 26 T20I wickets at an average of 33.23 with an economy of 8.01.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma?
Albie Morkel vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Albie Morkel and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Albie Morkel and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Albie Morkel or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.