⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Alzarri Joseph vs Shubman Gill: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Shubman Gill has the edge on the headline numbers: Shubman Gill leads on T20I batting (869 runs, avg 28.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Alzarri Joseph (West Indies) has 129 T20I runs at avg 16.1 in 45 matches. Shubman Gill (India) has 869 T20I runs at avg 28.0 in 36 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Alzarri Joseph vs Shubman Gill — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Alzarri Joseph | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 54 | 109 |
| Best fantasy score | 144 | 329 |
| Runs | 59 | 1288 |
| Strike rate | 67.0 | 113.5 |
| Fours | 4 | 163 |
| Sixes | 3 | 29 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Highest score | 21 | 223 |
| Wickets | 15 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 5.49 | 4.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 0 |
| Catches | 2 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 15 |
| Statistic | Alzarri Joseph | Shubman Gill |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 45 | 36 |
| Runs | 129 | 869 |
| Batting average | 16.13 | 28.03 |
| Strike rate | 103.2 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Wickets | 62 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 24.11 | — |
| Economy rate | 9.23 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Alzarri Joseph has played 45 T20Is and Shubman Gill 36. Alzarri Joseph has 129 runs at 16.1 (strike rate 103.2), against 869 at 28.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Alzarri Joseph 0, Shubman Gill 1. Fifties: 0 and 3. Alzarri Joseph also bowls: 62 wickets at an economy of 9.23, while Shubman Gill has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Alzarri Joseph has played 86 ODIs and Shubman Gill 70. Alzarri Joseph has 497 runs at 15.1 (strike rate 78.5), against 3,713 at 64.0 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Alzarri Joseph 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 0 and 20. Alzarri Joseph also bowls: 138 wickets at an economy of 5.43, while Shubman Gill has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Alzarri Joseph has played 42 Tests and Shubman Gill 43. Alzarri Joseph has 804 runs at 12.4 (strike rate 57.4), against 3,043 at 43.5 for Shubman Gill, so Shubman Gill has scored more. Hundreds: Alzarri Joseph 0, Shubman Gill 11. Fifties: 2 and 8. Alzarri Joseph also bowls: 130 wickets at an economy of 3.73, while Shubman Gill has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Alzarri Joseph vs Shubman Gill — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Alzarri Joseph has scored 129 T20I runs in 45 matches at an average of 16.13. He has also taken 62 T20I wickets at an average of 24.11 with an economy of 9.23.
T20I career: Shubman Gill has scored 869 T20I runs in 36 matches at an average of 28.03, with 1 century.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shubman Gill is the stronger pick with an average of 109 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill?
Alzarri Joseph vs Shubman Gill — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill?
What is the price difference between Alzarri Joseph and Shubman Gill?
How many MOTM awards have Alzarri Joseph and Shubman Gill won?
Should I pick Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill?
Who has more ODI runs, Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill?
Who has more Test runs, Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Alzarri Joseph or Shubman Gill — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.