⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Andre Russell vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Andre Russell () has 1,122 T20I runs at avg 22.0 in 86 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Andre Russell vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Andre Russell | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 214 |
| Runs | 0 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 0 | 85 |
| Sixes | 0 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 138 |
| Catches | 0 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 9 |
| Statistic | Andre Russell | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 86 | 159 |
| Runs | 1122 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 22.00 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | — | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 32 |
| Wickets | 61 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 30.18 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 9.27 | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Andre Russell has played 86 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Andre Russell has 1,122 runs at 22.0, against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Andre Russell 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 3 and 32. With the ball, Andre Russell has 61 wickets at an economy of 9.27 and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Andre Russell has more wickets.
ODI. Andre Russell has played 56 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Andre Russell has 1,034 runs at 27.2 (strike rate 130.2), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Andre Russell 0, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 4 and 63. With the ball, Andre Russell has 70 wickets at an economy of 5.84 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Andre Russell has more wickets while Rohit Sharma is more economical.
Test. Andre Russell has played 1 Test and Rohit Sharma 67. Andre Russell has 2 runs at 2.0 (strike rate 22.2), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Andre Russell 0, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 0 and 18.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Andre Russell vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Andre Russell has scored 1,122 T20I runs in 86 matches at an average of 22.00, with 3 half-centuries. He has also taken 61 T20I wickets at an average of 30.18 with an economy of 9.27.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma?
Andre Russell vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Andre Russell and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Andre Russell and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more ODI runs, Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Andre Russell or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.