⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Angelo Mathews vs Jos Buttler — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jos Buttler has the edge on the headline numbers: Jos Buttler leads on T20I batting (4,384 runs, avg 34.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Angelo Mathews (Sri Lanka) has 1,416 T20I runs at avg 27.8 in 90 matches. Jos Buttler (England) has 4,384 T20I runs at avg 34.8 in 163 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Angelo Mathews vs Jos Buttler — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Angelo Mathews | Jos Buttler |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 8 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 36 | 82 |
| Best fantasy score | 91 | 271 |
| Runs | 184 | 800 |
| Strike rate | 119.5 | 167.0 |
| Fours | 15 | 63 |
| Sixes | 4 | 48 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 7 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 45 | 131 |
| Wickets | 1 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 8.73 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 0 |
| Catches | 0 | 15 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 22 |
| Statistic | Angelo Mathews | Jos Buttler |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 90 | 163 |
| Runs | 1416 | 4384 |
| Batting average | 27.76 | 34.79 |
| Strike rate | 120.5 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 30 |
| Wickets | 45 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 30.87 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.13 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Angelo Mathews has played 90 T20Is and Jos Buttler 163. Angelo Mathews has 1,416 runs at 27.8 (strike rate 120.5), against 4,384 at 34.8 for Jos Buttler, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 0, Jos Buttler 2. Fifties: 6 and 30. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 45 wickets at an economy of 7.13, while Jos Buttler has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Angelo Mathews has played 226 ODIs and Jos Buttler 204. Angelo Mathews has 5,916 runs at 40.2 (strike rate 82.9), against 5,678 at 39.2 for Jos Buttler, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 3, Jos Buttler 11. Fifties: 40 and 30. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 126 wickets at an economy of 4.63, while Jos Buttler has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Angelo Mathews has played 119 Tests and Jos Buttler 57. Angelo Mathews has 8,214 runs at 44.4 (strike rate 49.1), against 2,907 at 31.9 (54.2) for Jos Buttler, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 16, Jos Buttler 2. Fifties: 45 and 18. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 33 wickets at an economy of 2.71, while Jos Buttler has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Angelo Mathews vs Jos Buttler — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Angelo Mathews has scored 1,416 T20I runs in 90 matches at an average of 27.76, with 6 half-centuries. He has also taken 45 T20I wickets at an average of 30.87 with an economy of 7.13.
T20I career: Jos Buttler has scored 4,384 T20I runs in 163 matches at an average of 34.79, with 2 centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jos Buttler is the stronger pick with an average of 82 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler?
Angelo Mathews vs Jos Buttler — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler?
What is the price difference between Angelo Mathews and Jos Buttler?
How many MOTM awards have Angelo Mathews and Jos Buttler won?
Should I pick Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler?
Who has more ODI runs, Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler?
Who has more Test runs, Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Angelo Mathews or Jos Buttler — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.