⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Angelo Mathews vs Rishabh Pant — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Angelo Mathews has the edge on the headline numbers: Angelo Mathews leads on T20I batting (1,416 runs, avg 27.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Angelo Mathews (Sri Lanka) has 1,416 T20I runs at avg 27.8 in 90 matches. Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,209 T20I runs at avg 23.3 in 76 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Angelo Mathews vs Rishabh Pant — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Angelo Mathews | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 8 | 17 |
| Avg fantasy points | 36 | 62 |
| Best fantasy score | 91 | 197 |
| Runs | 184 | 561 |
| Strike rate | 119.5 | 98.9 |
| Fours | 15 | 54 |
| Sixes | 4 | 19 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 45 | 105 |
| Wickets | 1 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 8.73 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 0 |
| Catches | 0 | 15 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 20 |
| Statistic | Angelo Mathews | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 90 | 76 |
| Runs | 1416 | 1209 |
| Batting average | 27.76 | 23.25 |
| Strike rate | 120.5 | — |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 3 |
| Wickets | 45 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 30.87 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.13 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Angelo Mathews has played 90 T20Is and Rishabh Pant 76. Angelo Mathews has 1,416 runs at 27.8 (strike rate 120.5), against 1,209 at 23.3 for Rishabh Pant, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 45 wickets at an economy of 7.13, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Angelo Mathews has played 226 ODIs and Rishabh Pant 31. Angelo Mathews has 5,916 runs at 40.2 (strike rate 82.9), against 871 at 33.5 (106.2) for Rishabh Pant, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 3, Rishabh Pant 1. Fifties: 40 and 5. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 126 wickets at an economy of 4.63, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Angelo Mathews has played 119 Tests and Rishabh Pant 51. Angelo Mathews has 8,214 runs at 44.4 (strike rate 49.1), against 3,644 at 43.4 (74.3) for Rishabh Pant, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 16, Rishabh Pant 8. Fifties: 45 and 20. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 33 wickets at an economy of 2.71, while Rishabh Pant has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 23 August 2026.
Angelo Mathews vs Rishabh Pant — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Angelo Mathews has scored 1,416 T20I runs in 90 matches at an average of 27.76, with 6 half-centuries. He has also taken 45 T20I wickets at an average of 30.87 with an economy of 7.13.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,209 T20I runs in 76 matches at an average of 23.25, with 3 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rishabh Pant is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant?
Angelo Mathews vs Rishabh Pant — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant?
What is the price difference between Angelo Mathews and Rishabh Pant?
How many MOTM awards have Angelo Mathews and Rishabh Pant won?
Should I pick Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant?
Who has more ODI runs, Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Angelo Mathews or Rishabh Pant — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.