⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Angelo Mathews vs Ryan Rickelton — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ryan Rickelton has the edge on the headline numbers: Ryan Rickelton leads on T20I batting (741 runs, avg 28.5). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Angelo Mathews (Sri Lanka) has 1,416 T20I runs at avg 27.8 in 90 matches. Ryan Rickelton (Mumbai Indians) has 741 T20I runs at avg 28.5 in 29 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Angelo Mathews vs Ryan Rickelton — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Angelo Mathews | Ryan Rickelton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 8 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 36 | 72 |
| Best fantasy score | 91 | 217 |
| Runs | 184 | 756 |
| Strike rate | 119.5 | 161.2 |
| Fours | 15 | 58 |
| Sixes | 4 | 51 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 45 | 123 |
| Wickets | 1 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 8.73 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 1 | 0 |
| Catches | 0 | 11 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 12 |
| Statistic | Angelo Mathews | Ryan Rickelton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 90 | 29 |
| Runs | 1416 | 741 |
| Batting average | 27.76 | 28.50 |
| Strike rate | 120.5 | — |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 4 |
| Wickets | 45 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 30.87 | — |
| Economy rate | 7.13 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Angelo Mathews has played 90 T20Is and Ryan Rickelton 29. Angelo Mathews has 1,416 runs at 27.8 (strike rate 120.5), against 741 at 28.5 for Ryan Rickelton, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 45 wickets at an economy of 7.13, while Ryan Rickelton has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Angelo Mathews has played 226 ODIs and Ryan Rickelton 19. Angelo Mathews has 5,916 runs at 40.2 (strike rate 82.9), against 552 at 32.5 for Ryan Rickelton, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 3, Ryan Rickelton 1. Fifties: 40 and 2. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 126 wickets at an economy of 4.63, while Ryan Rickelton has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Angelo Mathews has played 119 Tests and Ryan Rickelton 15. Angelo Mathews has 8,214 runs at 44.4 (strike rate 49.1), against 897 at 37.4 (52.9) for Ryan Rickelton, so Angelo Mathews has scored more. Hundreds: Angelo Mathews 16, Ryan Rickelton 2. Fifties: 45 and 1. Angelo Mathews also bowls: 33 wickets at an economy of 2.71, while Ryan Rickelton has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 4 March 2026.
Angelo Mathews vs Ryan Rickelton — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Angelo Mathews has scored 1,416 T20I runs in 90 matches at an average of 27.76, with 6 half-centuries. He has also taken 45 T20I wickets at an average of 30.87 with an economy of 7.13.
T20I career: Ryan Rickelton has scored 741 T20I runs in 29 matches at an average of 28.50, with 4 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ryan Rickelton is the stronger pick with an average of 72 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton?
Angelo Mathews vs Ryan Rickelton — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton?
What is the price difference between Angelo Mathews and Ryan Rickelton?
How many MOTM awards have Angelo Mathews and Ryan Rickelton won?
Should I pick Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton?
Who has more ODI runs, Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton?
Who has more Test runs, Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Angelo Mathews or Ryan Rickelton — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.