⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Athige Silva vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Athige Silva (Hong Kong Women) has 12 T20I runs at avg 3.0 in 21 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Athige Silva vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Athige Silva | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 1 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 10 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 10 | 214 |
| Runs | 4 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 200.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 1 | 85 |
| Sixes | 0 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 4 | 138 |
| Economy rate | 12.00 | 0.00 |
| Catches | 0 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 9 |
| Statistic | Athige Silva | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 21 | 159 |
| Runs | 12 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 3.00 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 46.1 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 32 |
| Wickets | 11 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 15.09 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 5.35 | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Athige Silva has played 21 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Athige Silva has 12 runs at 3.0 (strike rate 46.1), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Athige Silva 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 0 and 32. With the ball, Athige Silva has 11 wickets at an economy of 5.35 and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Athige Silva has more wickets.
ODI. Athige Silva has played 4 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Athige Silva has 1 runs (strike rate 100.0), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Athige Silva 0, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 0 and 63. With the ball, Athige Silva has 5 wickets at an economy of 4.81 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Rohit Sharma has more wickets while Athige Silva is more economical.
Test. Athige Silva has played 12 Tests and Rohit Sharma 67. Athige Silva has 702 runs at 35.1 (strike rate 41.0), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Athige Silva 1, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 5 and 18.
International numbers up to 29 August 2026.
Athige Silva vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Athige Silva has scored 12 T20I runs in 21 matches at an average of 3.00. She has also taken 11 T20I wickets at an average of 15.09 with an economy of 5.35.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma?
Athige Silva vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Athige Silva and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Athige Silva and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more ODI runs, Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Athige Silva or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.