⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ben Duckett vs Jamie Overton — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ben Duckett (England) has 527 T20I runs at avg 27.7 in 21 matches. Jamie Overton (Chennai Super Kings) has 88 T20I runs at avg 8.8 in 24 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ben Duckett vs Jamie Overton — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ben Duckett | Jamie Overton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 9 | 13 |
| Avg fantasy points | 102 | 64 |
| Best fantasy score | 203 | 141 |
| Runs | 606 | 146 |
| Strike rate | 105.4 | 158.7 |
| Fours | 89 | 13 |
| Sixes | 7 | 7 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 149 | 43 |
| Wickets | 0 | 17 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 9.23 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 4 |
| Catches | 5 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 5 | 2 |
| Statistic | Ben Duckett | Jamie Overton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 21 | 24 |
| Runs | 527 | 88 |
| Batting average | 27.74 | 8.80 |
| Strike rate | 153.2 | 104.8 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 26 |
| Bowling average | — | 18.35 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.25 |
Ben Duckett vs Jamie Overton — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ben Duckett has scored 527 T20I runs in 21 matches at an average of 27.74, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Jamie Overton has scored 88 T20I runs in 24 matches at an average of 8.80. He has also taken 26 T20I wickets at an average of 18.35 with an economy of 8.25.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Duckett is the stronger pick with an average of 102 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.