⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ben Duckett vs Ravindra Jadeja — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ben Duckett (England) has 527 T20I runs at avg 27.7 in 21 matches. Ravindra Jadeja (Rajasthan Royals) has 508 T20I runs at avg 22.1 in 71 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ben Duckett vs Ravindra Jadeja — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ben Duckett | Ravindra Jadeja |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 13 | 13 |
| Avg fantasy points | 85 | 54 |
| Best fantasy score | 203 | 105 |
| Runs | 719 | 266 |
| Strike rate | 106.7 | 135.0 |
| Fours | 105 | 24 |
| Sixes | 7 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 4 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Highest score | 149 | 45 |
| Wickets | 0 | 10 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 7.64 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 6 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 7 | 2 |
| Statistic | Ben Duckett | Ravindra Jadeja |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 21 | 71 |
| Runs | 527 | 508 |
| Batting average | 27.74 | 22.09 |
| Strike rate | 153.2 | 127.0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 51 |
| Bowling average | — | 30.55 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.21 |
Ben Duckett vs Ravindra Jadeja — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ben Duckett has scored 527 T20I runs in 21 matches at an average of 27.74, with 3 half-centuries.
T20I career: Ravindra Jadeja has scored 508 T20I runs in 71 matches at an average of 22.09. He has also taken 51 T20I wickets at an average of 30.55 with an economy of 7.21.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Duckett is the stronger pick with an average of 85 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.