⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ben Stokes vs Hardik Pandya — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Hardik Pandya has the edge on the headline numbers: Hardik Pandya leads on T20I batting (2,221 runs, avg 27.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Ben Stokes (England) has 585 T20I runs at avg 21.7 in 43 matches. Hardik Pandya (Mumbai Indians) has 2,221 T20I runs at avg 27.8 in 136 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ben Stokes vs Hardik Pandya — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Hardik Pandya |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 2 | 10 |
| Avg fantasy points | 135 | 44 |
| Best fantasy score | 231 | 103 |
| Runs | 57 | 206 |
| Strike rate | 72.2 | 138.3 |
| Fours | 5 | 21 |
| Sixes | 2 | 7 |
| Highest score | 45 | 40 |
| Wickets | 7 | 4 |
| Economy rate | 2.89 | 11.41 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 6 | 1 |
| Catches | 0 | 2 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 2 |
| Statistic | Ben Stokes | Hardik Pandya |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 43 | 136 |
| Runs | 585 | 2221 |
| Batting average | 21.67 | 27.76 |
| Strike rate | 131.5 | 145.1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 9 |
| Wickets | 26 | 114 |
| Bowling average | 32.92 | 26.82 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.33 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Ben Stokes has played 43 T20Is and Hardik Pandya 136. Ben Stokes has 585 runs at 21.7 (strike rate 131.5), against 2,221 at 27.8 (145.1) for Hardik Pandya, so Hardik Pandya has scored more. With the ball, Ben Stokes has 26 wickets and Hardik Pandya 114 at 8.33; Hardik Pandya has more wickets.
ODI. Ben Stokes has played 114 ODIs and Hardik Pandya 94. Ben Stokes has 3,463 runs at 41.2 (strike rate 95.8), against 1,904 at 32.8 (111.5) for Hardik Pandya, so Ben Stokes has scored more. Hundreds: Ben Stokes 5, Hardik Pandya 0. Fifties: 24 and 11. With the ball, Ben Stokes has 74 wickets at an economy of 6.08 and Hardik Pandya 91; Hardik Pandya has more wickets.
Test. Ben Stokes has played 122 Tests and Hardik Pandya 11. Ben Stokes has 7,273 runs at 34.5 (strike rate 58.9), against 532 at 31.3 for Hardik Pandya, so Ben Stokes has scored more. Hundreds: Ben Stokes 14, Hardik Pandya 1. Fifties: 37 and 4. With the ball, Ben Stokes has 252 wickets at an economy of 3.34 and Hardik Pandya 17 at 3.42; Ben Stokes has more wickets.
International numbers up to 8 March 2026.
Ben Stokes vs Hardik Pandya — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ben Stokes has scored 585 T20I runs in 43 matches at an average of 21.67, with 1 half-century. He has also taken 26 T20I wickets at an average of 32.92.
T20I career: Hardik Pandya has scored 2,221 T20I runs in 136 matches at an average of 27.76, with 9 half-centuries. He has also taken 114 T20I wickets at an average of 26.82 with an economy of 8.33.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Ben Stokes is the stronger pick with an average of 135 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya?
Ben Stokes vs Hardik Pandya — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya?
What is the price difference between Ben Stokes and Hardik Pandya?
How many MOTM awards have Ben Stokes and Hardik Pandya won?
Should I pick Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya?
Who has more ODI runs, Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Ben Stokes or Hardik Pandya — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.