⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Beth Mooney vs Sophie Ecclestone — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Beth Mooney has the edge on the headline numbers: Beth Mooney leads on T20I batting (3,739 runs, avg 41.5). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Beth Mooney (Australia Women) has 3,739 T20I runs at avg 41.5 in 123 matches. Sophie Ecclestone (England Women) has 368 T20I runs at avg 17.5 in 113 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Beth Mooney vs Sophie Ecclestone — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Beth Mooney | Sophie Ecclestone |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 18 |
| Avg fantasy points | 52 | 68 |
| Best fantasy score | 120 | 337 |
| Runs | 556 | 97 |
| Strike rate | 116.3 | 82.2 |
| Fours | 62 | 12 |
| Sixes | 4 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 7 | 1 |
| Highest score | 79 | 61 |
| Wickets | 0 | 27 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 4.90 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 8 |
| Catches | 9 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 17 | 8 |
| Statistic | Beth Mooney | Sophie Ecclestone |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 123 | 113 |
| Runs | 3739 | 368 |
| Batting average | 41.54 | 17.52 |
| Strike rate | 127.2 | 132.8 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 31 | 0 |
| Wickets | 0 | 154 |
| Bowling average | — | 16.51 |
| Economy rate | — | 6.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Beth Mooney has played 123 T20Is and Sophie Ecclestone 113. Beth Mooney has 3,739 runs at 41.5 (strike rate 127.2), against 368 at 17.5 (132.8) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Beth Mooney has scored more. Hundreds: Beth Mooney 2, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 31 and 0. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 154 wickets at an economy of 6.05, while Beth Mooney has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Beth Mooney has played 93 ODIs and Sophie Ecclestone 84. Beth Mooney has 3,073 runs at 48.8, against 426 at 10.7 (73.6) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Beth Mooney has scored more. Hundreds: Beth Mooney 5, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 20 and 0. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 141 wickets, while Beth Mooney has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Beth Mooney has played 9 Tests and Sophie Ecclestone 10. Beth Mooney has 578 runs at 41.3 (strike rate 52.5), against 257 at 19.8 (46.6) for Sophie Ecclestone, so Beth Mooney has scored more. Hundreds: Beth Mooney 1, Sophie Ecclestone 0. Fifties: 4 and 1. Sophie Ecclestone also bowls: 48 wickets at an economy of 2.91, while Beth Mooney has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 10 July 2026.
Beth Mooney vs Sophie Ecclestone — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Beth Mooney has scored 3,739 T20I runs in 123 matches at an average of 41.54, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Sophie Ecclestone has scored 368 T20I runs in 113 matches at an average of 17.52. She has also taken 154 T20I wickets at an average of 16.51 with an economy of 6.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Sophie Ecclestone is the stronger pick with an average of 68 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone?
Beth Mooney vs Sophie Ecclestone — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone?
What is the price difference between Beth Mooney and Sophie Ecclestone?
How many MOTM awards have Beth Mooney and Sophie Ecclestone won?
Should I pick Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone?
Who has more Test runs, Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Beth Mooney or Sophie Ecclestone — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.