⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Bhuvneshwar Kumar vs Jos Buttler — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jos Buttler has the edge on the headline numbers: Jos Buttler leads on T20I batting (4,384 runs, avg 34.8). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Bhuvneshwar Kumar (Royal Challengers Bengaluru) has 67 T20I runs at avg 8.4 in 87 matches. Jos Buttler (England) has 4,384 T20I runs at avg 34.8 in 163 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Bhuvneshwar Kumar vs Jos Buttler — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Bhuvneshwar Kumar | Jos Buttler |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 16 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 61 | 82 |
| Best fantasy score | 169 | 271 |
| Runs | 34 | 800 |
| Strike rate | 130.8 | 167.0 |
| Fours | 3 | 63 |
| Sixes | 1 | 48 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 7 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 15 | 131 |
| Wickets | 28 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.95 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 0 |
| Catches | 1 | 15 |
| Total dismissals | 2 | 22 |
| Statistic | Bhuvneshwar Kumar | Jos Buttler |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 87 | 163 |
| Runs | 67 | 4384 |
| Batting average | 8.38 | 34.79 |
| Strike rate | 71.3 | — |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 30 |
| Wickets | 90 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 23.10 | — |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has played 87 T20Is and Jos Buttler 163. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has 67 runs at 8.4 (strike rate 71.3), against 4,384 at 34.8 for Jos Buttler, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Bhuvneshwar Kumar 0, Jos Buttler 2. Fifties: 0 and 30. Bhuvneshwar Kumar also bowls: 90 wickets, while Jos Buttler has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has played 121 ODIs and Jos Buttler 204. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has 552 runs at 14.2 (strike rate 73.9), against 5,678 at 39.2 for Jos Buttler, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Bhuvneshwar Kumar 0, Jos Buttler 11. Fifties: 1 and 30. Bhuvneshwar Kumar also bowls: 141 wickets at an economy of 5.10, while Jos Buttler has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has played 21 Tests and Jos Buttler 57. Bhuvneshwar Kumar has 552 runs at 22.1 (strike rate 45.1), against 2,907 at 31.9 (54.2) for Jos Buttler, so Jos Buttler has scored more. Hundreds: Bhuvneshwar Kumar 0, Jos Buttler 2. Fifties: 3 and 18. Bhuvneshwar Kumar also bowls: 63 wickets at an economy of 2.95, while Jos Buttler has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Bhuvneshwar Kumar vs Jos Buttler — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Bhuvneshwar Kumar has scored 67 T20I runs in 87 matches at an average of 8.38. He has also taken 90 T20I wickets at an average of 23.10.
T20I career: Jos Buttler has scored 4,384 T20I runs in 163 matches at an average of 34.79, with 2 centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jos Buttler is the stronger pick with an average of 82 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler?
Bhuvneshwar Kumar vs Jos Buttler — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler?
What is the price difference between Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jos Buttler?
How many MOTM awards have Bhuvneshwar Kumar and Jos Buttler won?
Should I pick Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler?
Who has more ODI runs, Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler?
Who has more Test runs, Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Bhuvneshwar Kumar or Jos Buttler — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.