⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Brad Evans vs Joe Root — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Joe Root has the edge on the headline numbers: Joe Root leads on T20I batting (893 runs, avg 35.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Brad Evans (Zimbabwe) has 224 T20I runs at avg 13.2 in 37 matches. Joe Root (England) has 893 T20I runs at avg 35.7 in 32 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Brad Evans vs Joe Root — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Brad Evans | Joe Root |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 18 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 96 | 63 |
| Best fantasy score | 169 | 163 |
| Runs | 333 | 847 |
| Strike rate | 131.6 | 79.5 |
| Fours | 23 | 90 |
| Sixes | 20 | 4 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 58 | 123 |
| Wickets | 34 | 2 |
| Economy rate | 6.72 | 5.61 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 1 |
| Catches | 10 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 10 | 10 |
| Statistic | Brad Evans | Joe Root |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 37 | 32 |
| Runs | 224 | 893 |
| Batting average | 13.18 | 35.72 |
| Strike rate | 128.7 | 126.3 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Wickets | 54 | 6 |
| Bowling average | 19.59 | 23.17 |
| Economy rate | 8.46 | 9.93 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Brad Evans has played 37 T20Is and Joe Root 32. Brad Evans has 224 runs at 13.2 (strike rate 128.7), against 893 at 35.7 (126.3) for Joe Root, so Joe Root has scored more. With the ball, Brad Evans has 54 wickets at an economy of 8.46 and Joe Root 6 at 9.93; Brad Evans has more wickets.
ODI. Brad Evans has played 20 ODIs and Joe Root 195. Brad Evans has 240 runs at 17.1 (strike rate 98.4), against 7,903 at 50.7 for Joe Root, so Joe Root has scored more. Hundreds: Brad Evans 0, Joe Root 20. Fifties: 2 and 48. With the ball, Brad Evans has 20 wickets at an economy of 5.63 and Joe Root 31 at 5.91; Joe Root has more wickets while Brad Evans is more economical.
Test. Brad Evans has played 3 Tests and Joe Root 169. Brad Evans has 46 runs at 15.3, against 14,278 at 50.5 (57.8) for Joe Root, so Joe Root has scored more. Hundreds: Brad Evans 0, Joe Root 41. Fifties: 0 and 69. With the ball, Brad Evans has 10 wickets and Joe Root 74 at 3.37; Joe Root has more wickets.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Brad Evans vs Joe Root — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Brad Evans has scored 224 T20I runs in 37 matches at an average of 13.18. He has also taken 54 T20I wickets at an average of 19.59 with an economy of 8.46.
T20I career: Joe Root has scored 893 T20I runs in 32 matches at an average of 35.72, with 5 half-centuries. He has also taken 6 T20I wickets at an average of 23.17 with an economy of 9.93.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Brad Evans is the stronger pick with an average of 96 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Brad Evans or Joe Root?
Brad Evans vs Joe Root — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Brad Evans or Joe Root?
What is the price difference between Brad Evans and Joe Root?
How many MOTM awards have Brad Evans and Joe Root won?
Should I pick Brad Evans or Joe Root in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Brad Evans or Joe Root?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Brad Evans or Joe Root?
Who has more ODI runs, Brad Evans or Joe Root?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Brad Evans or Joe Root?
Who has more Test runs, Brad Evans or Joe Root?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Brad Evans or Joe Root?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Brad Evans or Joe Root — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.