⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Brad Evans vs Josh Hazlewood — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Brad Evans has the edge on the headline numbers: Brad Evans leads on T20I batting (224 runs, avg 13.2). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Brad Evans (Zimbabwe) has 224 T20I runs at avg 13.2 in 37 matches. Josh Hazlewood (Royal Challengers Bengaluru) has 29 T20I runs at avg 9.7 in 60 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Brad Evans vs Josh Hazlewood — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Brad Evans | Josh Hazlewood |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 18 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 96 | 67 |
| Best fantasy score | 169 | 260 |
| Runs | 333 | 11 |
| Strike rate | 131.6 | 33.3 |
| Fours | 23 | 1 |
| Sixes | 20 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 0 |
| Highest score | 58 | 5 |
| Wickets | 34 | 36 |
| Economy rate | 6.72 | 5.84 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 4 | 8 |
| Catches | 10 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 10 | 10 |
| Statistic | Brad Evans | Josh Hazlewood |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 37 | 60 |
| Runs | 224 | 29 |
| Batting average | 13.18 | 9.67 |
| Strike rate | 128.7 | 138.1 |
| Wickets | 54 | 79 |
| Bowling average | 19.59 | 20.41 |
| Economy rate | 8.46 | 7.41 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Brad Evans has played 37 T20Is and Josh Hazlewood 60. Brad Evans has 224 runs at 13.2 (strike rate 128.7), against 29 at 9.7 (138.1) for Josh Hazlewood, so Brad Evans has scored more. With the ball, Brad Evans has 54 wickets at an economy of 8.46 and Josh Hazlewood 79 at 7.41; Josh Hazlewood has more wickets.
ODI. Brad Evans has played 20 ODIs and Josh Hazlewood 99. Brad Evans has 240 runs at 17.1 (strike rate 98.4), against 137 at 13.7 (82.5) for Josh Hazlewood, so Brad Evans has scored more. With the ball, Brad Evans has 20 wickets at an economy of 5.63 and Josh Hazlewood 148; Josh Hazlewood has more wickets.
Test. Brad Evans has played 3 Tests and Josh Hazlewood 78. Brad Evans has 46 runs at 15.3, against 575 at 11.5 (43.9) for Josh Hazlewood, so Josh Hazlewood has scored more. With the ball, Brad Evans has 10 wickets and Josh Hazlewood 303 at 2.78; Josh Hazlewood has more wickets.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Brad Evans vs Josh Hazlewood — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Brad Evans has scored 224 T20I runs in 37 matches at an average of 13.18. He has also taken 54 T20I wickets at an average of 19.59 with an economy of 8.46.
T20I career: Josh Hazlewood has scored 29 T20I runs in 60 matches at an average of 9.67. He has also taken 79 T20I wickets at an average of 20.41 with an economy of 7.41.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Brad Evans is the stronger pick with an average of 96 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
Brad Evans vs Josh Hazlewood — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
What is the price difference between Brad Evans and Josh Hazlewood?
How many MOTM awards have Brad Evans and Josh Hazlewood won?
Should I pick Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
Who has more ODI runs, Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
Who has more Test runs, Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Brad Evans or Josh Hazlewood — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.