⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Brendan Taylor vs Jamie Overton: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Brendan Taylor has the edge on the headline numbers: Brendan Taylor leads on T20I batting (1,216 runs, avg 24.3). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Brendan Taylor (Zimbabwe) has 1,216 T20I runs at avg 24.3 in 59 matches. Jamie Overton (Chennai Super Kings) has 88 T20I runs at avg 8.8 in 27 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Brendan Taylor vs Jamie Overton — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Brendan Taylor | Jamie Overton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 5 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 50 | 57 |
| Best fantasy score | 120 | 119 |
| Runs | 134 | 143 |
| Strike rate | 77.0 | 144.4 |
| Fours | 14 | 12 |
| Sixes | 0 | 6 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 81 | 27 |
| Wickets | 0 | 22 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 6.97 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 3 |
| Catches | 5 | 12 |
| Total dismissals | 6 | 12 |
| Statistic | Brendan Taylor | Jamie Overton |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 59 | 27 |
| Runs | 1216 | 88 |
| Batting average | 24.32 | 8.80 |
| Strike rate | — | 104.8 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 0 |
| Wickets | 1 | 31 |
| Bowling average | 17.00 | 17.23 |
| Economy rate | 3.40 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Brendan Taylor has played 59 T20Is and Jamie Overton 27. Brendan Taylor has 1,216 runs at 24.3, against 88 at 8.8 (104.8) for Jamie Overton, so Brendan Taylor has scored more. Hundreds: Brendan Taylor 1, Jamie Overton 0. Fifties: 6 and 0. With the ball, Brendan Taylor has 1 wickets at an economy of 3.40 and Jamie Overton 31; Jamie Overton has more wickets.
ODI. Brendan Taylor has played 210 ODIs and Jamie Overton 16. Brendan Taylor has 6,756 runs at 35.0 (strike rate 77.5), against 303 at 25.3 for Jamie Overton, so Brendan Taylor has scored more. Hundreds: Brendan Taylor 11, Jamie Overton 0. Fifties: 39 and 1. With the ball, Brendan Taylor has 9 wickets at an economy of 6.15 and Jamie Overton 17; Jamie Overton has more wickets.
Test. Brendan Taylor has played 37 Tests and Jamie Overton 2. Brendan Taylor has 2,420 runs at 35.6, against 106 at 35.3 (67.5) for Jamie Overton, so Brendan Taylor has scored more. Hundreds: Brendan Taylor 6, Jamie Overton 0. Fifties: 12 and 1.
International numbers up to 5 March 2026.
Brendan Taylor vs Jamie Overton — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Brendan Taylor has scored 1,216 T20I runs in 59 matches at an average of 24.32, with 1 century. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 17.00 with an economy of 3.40.
T20I career: Jamie Overton has scored 88 T20I runs in 27 matches at an average of 8.80. He has also taken 31 T20I wickets at an average of 17.23.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Jamie Overton is the stronger pick with an average of 57 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton?
Brendan Taylor vs Jamie Overton — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton?
What is the price difference between Brendan Taylor and Jamie Overton?
How many MOTM awards have Brendan Taylor and Jamie Overton won?
Should I pick Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton?
Who has more ODI runs, Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton?
Who has more Test runs, Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Brendan Taylor or Jamie Overton — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.