⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Cameron Green vs Kagiso Rabada — IPL 2026 Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Kagiso Rabada has the edge on the headline numbers: Kagiso Rabada averages 61 IPL fantasy pts/match vs Cameron Green's 58. Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Cameron Green (Kolkata Knight Riders) averages 58 fantasy pts per match. Kagiso Rabada (Gujarat Titans) averages 61 fantasy pts. Full IPL stats & fantasy cricket comparison: batting, bowling, fielding, and form.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Cameron Green vs Kagiso Rabada — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Cameron Green | Kagiso Rabada |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 17 |
| Avg fantasy points | 58 | 61 |
| Best fantasy score | 164 | 130 |
| Runs | 591 | 47 |
| Strike rate | 84.4 | 123.7 |
| Fours | 38 | 5 |
| Sixes | 21 | 2 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 4 | 0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 117 | 23 |
| Wickets | 7 | 29 |
| Economy rate | 8.43 | 9.68 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 3 |
| Catches | 12 | 7 |
| Total dismissals | 12 | 7 |
| Statistic | Cameron Green | Kagiso Rabada |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 28 | 78 |
| Runs | 638 | 184 |
| Batting average | 29.00 | 15.33 |
| Strike rate | 151.5 | 115.7 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 0 |
| Wickets | 14 | 82 |
| Bowling average | 26.64 | 28.65 |
| Economy rate | 9.21 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Cameron Green has played 28 T20Is and Kagiso Rabada 78. Cameron Green has 638 runs at 29.0 (strike rate 151.5), against 184 at 15.3 (115.7) for Kagiso Rabada, so Cameron Green has scored more. With the ball, Cameron Green has 14 wickets at an economy of 9.21 and Kagiso Rabada 82; Kagiso Rabada has more wickets.
ODI. Cameron Green has played 40 ODIs and Kagiso Rabada 106. Cameron Green has 991 runs at 38.1, against 401 at 14.8 (79.1) for Kagiso Rabada, so Cameron Green has scored more. Hundreds: Cameron Green 1, Kagiso Rabada 0. Fifties: 4 and 0. With the ball, Cameron Green has 21 wickets at an economy of 5.77 and Kagiso Rabada 168; Kagiso Rabada has more wickets.
Test. Cameron Green has played 39 Tests and Kagiso Rabada 73. Cameron Green has 1,920 runs at 34.3 (strike rate 50.1), against 1,102 at 12.2 (51.7) for Kagiso Rabada, so Cameron Green has scored more. Hundreds: Cameron Green 3, Kagiso Rabada 0. Fifties: 8 and 1. With the ball, Cameron Green has 39 wickets at an economy of 3.56 and Kagiso Rabada 340 at 3.35; Kagiso Rabada has more wickets.
International numbers up to 22 August 2026.
Cameron Green vs Kagiso Rabada is one of the most searched cricket comparisons, combining international career stats with IPL fantasy data. Both players bring different strengths to your XI, and the right choice can be the difference between topping the leaderboard or missing out.
Cameron Green is a all-rounder for Kolkata Knight Riders, priced at 9 Cr this season. Over 20 matches in IPL 2026, he has scored a total of 1150 fantasy points, averaging 58 pts per game with a best of 164 pts. With the bat he has accumulated 591 IPL runs at a strike rate of 84.4, and has claimed 7 IPL wickets with an economy of 8.43.
International career: Cameron Green has scored 991 ODI runs in 40 matches at an average of 38.12, with 1 century internationally. He has also taken 21 ODI wickets at an average of 41.38 with an economy of 5.77. In TESTs, he has 1,920 runs across 39 matches (avg 34.3).
Kagiso Rabada is a specialist bowler for Gujarat Titans, priced at 9 Cr. Across 17 matches in IPL 2026, he has earned 1037 fantasy points, averaging 61 pts per game with a best of 130 pts. He has scored 47 IPL runs at a strike rate of 123.7, picking up 29 IPL wickets at an economy of 9.68. He has won 2 MOTM awards this season.
International career: Kagiso Rabada has scored 401 ODI runs in 106 matches at an average of 14.85 internationally. He has also taken 168 ODI wickets at an average of 27.45. He has taken 82 T20I wickets internationally.
Batting edge: Cameron Green leads with the bat this season, making them the better pick if the pitch is expected to be batting-friendly or if the match is being played on a flat track.
Bowling edge: Kagiso Rabada has been the more impactful bowler in IPL 2026, and becomes especially valuable in conditions that offer pace or spin movement.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Kagiso Rabada is the stronger pick right now with an average of 61 pts per game and a best score of 130 pts. The value-for-money metric (points per credit) further reinforces this — always check this number before finalising your captain or vice-captain choice.
Captaincy Recommendation: Based on IPL 2026 season form, Kagiso Rabada is the safer captaincy option. However, if the opposition's bowling or batting lineup suits the other player, consider rotating your captain pick. Always check the playing XI, pitch report, and toss result before locking in your captain.
Stats are updated after every IPL 2026 match. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool or check the Fantasy Leaderboard to see how top managers are building their teams.
Who has better IPL 2026 stats — Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
Cameron Green vs Kagiso Rabada — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
What is the price difference between Cameron Green and Kagiso Rabada?
How many MOTM awards have Cameron Green and Kagiso Rabada won?
Should I pick Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
Who has more ODI runs, Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
Who has more Test runs, Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Cameron Green or Kagiso Rabada — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.