⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Chamari Athapaththu vs Jasprit Bumrah — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Chamari Athapaththu has the edge on the headline numbers: Chamari Athapaththu leads on T20I batting (3,611 runs, avg 29.6). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Chamari Athapaththu (Sri Lanka Women) has 3,611 T20I runs at avg 29.6 in 133 matches. Jasprit Bumrah (India) has 12 T20I runs at avg 2.0 in 100 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Chamari Athapaththu vs Jasprit Bumrah — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Chamari Athapaththu | Jasprit Bumrah |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 101 | 26 |
| Best fantasy score | 255 | 74 |
| Runs | 271 | 25 |
| Strike rate | 144.9 | 166.7 |
| Fours | 40 | 4 |
| Sixes | 8 | 1 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 106 | 20 |
| Wickets | 15 | 11 |
| Economy rate | 6.30 | 7.06 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 7 | 2 |
| Catches | 3 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 3 |
| Statistic | Chamari Athapaththu | Jasprit Bumrah |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 133 | 100 |
| Runs | 3611 | 12 |
| Batting average | 29.60 | 2.00 |
| Strike rate | 118.9 | 66.7 |
| Centuries (100+) | 4 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 14 | 0 |
| Wickets | 66 | 126 |
| Bowling average | 25.64 | 18.21 |
| Economy rate | 6.74 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Chamari Athapaththu has played 133 T20Is and Jasprit Bumrah 100. Chamari Athapaththu has 3,611 runs at 29.6 (strike rate 118.9), against 12 at 2.0 (66.7) for Jasprit Bumrah, so Chamari Athapaththu has scored more. Hundreds: Chamari Athapaththu 4, Jasprit Bumrah 0. Fifties: 14 and 0. With the ball, Chamari Athapaththu has 66 wickets at an economy of 6.74 and Jasprit Bumrah 126; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
ODI. Chamari Athapaththu has played 91 ODIs and Jasprit Bumrah 91. Chamari Athapaththu has 3,300 runs at 38.8 (strike rate 79.6), against 111 at 9.3 (64.9) for Jasprit Bumrah, so Chamari Athapaththu has scored more. Hundreds: Chamari Athapaththu 8, Jasprit Bumrah 0. Fifties: 16 and 0. With the ball, Chamari Athapaththu has 55 wickets at an economy of 5.28 and Jasprit Bumrah 151; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
International numbers up to 29 August 2026.
Chamari Athapaththu vs Jasprit Bumrah — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Chamari Athapaththu has scored 3,611 T20I runs in 133 matches at an average of 29.60, with 4 centuries. She has also taken 66 T20I wickets at an average of 25.64 with an economy of 6.74.
T20I career: Jasprit Bumrah has scored 12 T20I runs in 100 matches at an average of 2.00. He has also taken 126 T20I wickets at an average of 18.21.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Chamari Athapaththu is the stronger pick with an average of 101 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah?
Chamari Athapaththu vs Jasprit Bumrah — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah?
What is the price difference between Chamari Athapaththu and Jasprit Bumrah?
How many MOTM awards have Chamari Athapaththu and Jasprit Bumrah won?
Should I pick Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has more ODI runs, Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Chamari Athapaththu or Jasprit Bumrah — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.