⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Chamari Athapaththu vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Chamari Athapaththu (Sri Lanka Women) has 3,611 T20I runs at avg 29.6 in 133 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Chamari Athapaththu vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Chamari Athapaththu | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 101 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 255 | 214 |
| Runs | 271 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 144.9 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 40 | 85 |
| Sixes | 8 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 2 |
| Highest score | 106 | 138 |
| Wickets | 15 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 6.30 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 7 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 9 |
| Statistic | Chamari Athapaththu | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 133 | 159 |
| Runs | 3611 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 29.60 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 118.9 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 4 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 14 | 32 |
| Wickets | 66 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 25.64 | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.74 | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Chamari Athapaththu has played 133 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Chamari Athapaththu has 3,611 runs at 29.6 (strike rate 118.9), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Chamari Athapaththu 4, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 14 and 32. With the ball, Chamari Athapaththu has 66 wickets at an economy of 6.74 and Rohit Sharma 1 at 9.97; Chamari Athapaththu has more wickets.
ODI. Chamari Athapaththu has played 91 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Chamari Athapaththu has 3,300 runs at 38.8 (strike rate 79.6), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Chamari Athapaththu 8, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 16 and 63. With the ball, Chamari Athapaththu has 55 wickets at an economy of 5.28 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Chamari Athapaththu has more wickets while Rohit Sharma is more economical.
International numbers up to 29 August 2026.
Chamari Athapaththu vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Chamari Athapaththu has scored 3,611 T20I runs in 133 matches at an average of 29.60, with 4 centuries. She has also taken 66 T20I wickets at an average of 25.64 with an economy of 6.74.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Chamari Athapaththu is the stronger pick with an average of 101 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma?
Chamari Athapaththu vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Chamari Athapaththu and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Chamari Athapaththu and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Chamari Athapaththu or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.