⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Chamari Athapaththu vs Virat Kohli — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Virat Kohli has the edge on the headline numbers: Virat Kohli leads on T20I batting (4,188 runs, avg 48.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Chamari Athapaththu (Sri Lanka Women) has 3,611 T20I runs at avg 29.6 in 133 matches. Virat Kohli (India) has 4,188 T20I runs at avg 48.7 in 125 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Chamari Athapaththu vs Virat Kohli — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Chamari Athapaththu | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 101 | 81 |
| Best fantasy score | 255 | 211 |
| Runs | 271 | 890 |
| Strike rate | 144.9 | 150.6 |
| Fours | 40 | 92 |
| Sixes | 8 | 32 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 6 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 2 |
| Highest score | 106 | 139 |
| Wickets | 15 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 6.30 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 7 | 0 |
| Catches | 3 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 3 | 11 |
| Statistic | Chamari Athapaththu | Virat Kohli |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 133 | 125 |
| Runs | 3611 | 4188 |
| Batting average | 29.60 | 48.70 |
| Strike rate | 118.9 | 137.0 |
| Centuries (100+) | 4 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 14 | 38 |
| Wickets | 66 | 4 |
| Bowling average | 25.64 | 51.00 |
| Economy rate | 6.74 | 8.05 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Chamari Athapaththu has played 133 T20Is and Virat Kohli 125. Chamari Athapaththu has 3,611 runs at 29.6 (strike rate 118.9), against 4,188 at 48.7 (137.0) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Chamari Athapaththu 4, Virat Kohli 1. Fifties: 14 and 38. With the ball, Chamari Athapaththu has 66 wickets at an economy of 6.74 and Virat Kohli 4 at 8.05; Chamari Athapaththu has more wickets.
ODI. Chamari Athapaththu has played 91 ODIs and Virat Kohli 315. Chamari Athapaththu has 3,300 runs at 38.8 (strike rate 79.6), against 15,080 at 59.1 (95.5) for Virat Kohli, so Virat Kohli has scored more. Hundreds: Chamari Athapaththu 8, Virat Kohli 55. Fifties: 16 and 79. With the ball, Chamari Athapaththu has 55 wickets at an economy of 5.28 and Virat Kohli 5 at 6.16; Chamari Athapaththu has more wickets.
International numbers up to 29 August 2026.
Chamari Athapaththu vs Virat Kohli — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Chamari Athapaththu has scored 3,611 T20I runs in 133 matches at an average of 29.60, with 4 centuries. She has also taken 66 T20I wickets at an average of 25.64 with an economy of 6.74.
T20I career: Virat Kohli has scored 4,188 T20I runs in 125 matches at an average of 48.70, with 1 century. He has also taken 4 T20I wickets at an average of 51.00 with an economy of 8.05.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Chamari Athapaththu is the stronger pick with an average of 101 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli?
Chamari Athapaththu vs Virat Kohli — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli?
What is the price difference between Chamari Athapaththu and Virat Kohli?
How many MOTM awards have Chamari Athapaththu and Virat Kohli won?
Should I pick Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Chamari Athapaththu or Virat Kohli — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.