⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Chris Jordan vs Jasprit Bumrah — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Chris Jordan has the edge on the headline numbers: Chris Jordan leads on T20I batting (439 runs, avg 13.7). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Chris Jordan (Belfast Wolves) has 439 T20I runs at avg 13.7 in 95 matches. Jasprit Bumrah (India) has 12 T20I runs at avg 2.0 in 100 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Chris Jordan vs Jasprit Bumrah — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Chris Jordan | Jasprit Bumrah |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 19 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 37 | 26 |
| Best fantasy score | 69 | 74 |
| Runs | 67 | 25 |
| Strike rate | 124.1 | 166.7 |
| Fours | 4 | 4 |
| Sixes | 3 | 1 |
| Highest score | 14 | 20 |
| Wickets | 13 | 11 |
| Economy rate | 9.46 | 7.06 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 2 |
| Catches | 15 | 3 |
| Total dismissals | 17 | 3 |
| Statistic | Chris Jordan | Jasprit Bumrah |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 95 | 100 |
| Runs | 439 | 12 |
| Batting average | 13.72 | 2.00 |
| Strike rate | 136.3 | 66.7 |
| Wickets | 108 | 126 |
| Bowling average | 26.19 | 18.21 |
| Economy rate | 8.74 | — |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Chris Jordan has played 95 T20Is and Jasprit Bumrah 100. Chris Jordan has 439 runs at 13.7 (strike rate 136.3), against 12 at 2.0 (66.7) for Jasprit Bumrah, so Chris Jordan has scored more. With the ball, Chris Jordan has 108 wickets at an economy of 8.74 and Jasprit Bumrah 126; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
ODI. Chris Jordan has played 35 ODIs and Jasprit Bumrah 91. Chris Jordan has 184 runs at 12.3 (strike rate 87.2), against 111 at 9.3 (64.9) for Jasprit Bumrah, so Chris Jordan has scored more. With the ball, Chris Jordan has 46 wickets at an economy of 6.09 and Jasprit Bumrah 151; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
Test. Chris Jordan has played 8 Tests and Jasprit Bumrah 52. Chris Jordan has 180 runs at 18.0 (strike rate 56.3), against 348 at 6.6 (41.3) for Jasprit Bumrah, so Jasprit Bumrah has scored more. With the ball, Chris Jordan has 21 wickets at an economy of 2.95 and Jasprit Bumrah 234 at 2.77; Jasprit Bumrah has more wickets.
International numbers up to 16 July 2026.
Chris Jordan vs Jasprit Bumrah — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Chris Jordan has scored 439 T20I runs in 95 matches at an average of 13.72. She has also taken 108 T20I wickets at an average of 26.19 with an economy of 8.74.
T20I career: Jasprit Bumrah has scored 12 T20I runs in 100 matches at an average of 2.00. He has also taken 126 T20I wickets at an average of 18.21.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Chris Jordan is the stronger pick with an average of 37 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
Chris Jordan vs Jasprit Bumrah — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
What is the price difference between Chris Jordan and Jasprit Bumrah?
How many MOTM awards have Chris Jordan and Jasprit Bumrah won?
Should I pick Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has more ODI runs, Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has more Test runs, Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Chris Jordan or Jasprit Bumrah — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.