⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
David Warner vs Kane Williamson — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
David Warner has the edge on the headline numbers: David Warner leads on T20I batting (3,277 runs, avg 33.4). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
David Warner (Australia) has 3,277 T20I runs at avg 33.4 in 110 matches. Kane Williamson (New Zealand) has 2,575 T20I runs at avg 33.4 in 93 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
David Warner vs Kane Williamson — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | David Warner | Kane Williamson |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 69 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 69 |
| Runs | 0 | 18 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 47.4 |
| Fours | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 18 |
| Catches | 0 | 4 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 4 |
| Statistic | David Warner | Kane Williamson |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 110 | 93 |
| Runs | 3277 | 2575 |
| Batting average | 33.44 | 33.44 |
| Strike rate | 143.8 | 126.2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 28 | 18 |
| Wickets | 0 | 6 |
| Bowling average | — | 27.33 |
| Economy rate | — | 8.34 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. David Warner has played 110 T20Is and Kane Williamson 93. David Warner has 3,277 runs at 33.4 (strike rate 143.8), against 2,575 at 33.4 (126.2) for Kane Williamson, so David Warner has scored more. Hundreds: David Warner 1, Kane Williamson 0. Fifties: 28 and 18. Kane Williamson also bowls: 6 wickets at an economy of 8.34, while David Warner has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. David Warner has played 161 ODIs and Kane Williamson 175. David Warner has 6,932 runs at 45.3 (strike rate 101.5), against 7,256 at 48.7 (82.9) for Kane Williamson, so Kane Williamson has scored more. Hundreds: David Warner 22, Kane Williamson 15. Fifties: 33 and 47. Kane Williamson also bowls: 37 wickets at an economy of 5.36, while David Warner has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. David Warner has played 112 Tests and Kane Williamson 110. David Warner has 8,786 runs at 44.6 (strike rate 70.2), against 9,515 at 54.1 (52.3) for Kane Williamson, so Kane Williamson has scored more. Hundreds: David Warner 26, Kane Williamson 33. Fifties: 37 and 38. With the ball, David Warner has 4 wickets at an economy of 4.72 and Kane Williamson 30 at 3.37; Kane Williamson has more wickets.
International numbers up to 4 June 2026.
David Warner vs Kane Williamson — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: David Warner has scored 3,277 T20I runs in 110 matches at an average of 33.44, with 1 century.
T20I career: Kane Williamson has scored 2,575 T20I runs in 93 matches at an average of 33.44, with 18 half-centuries. He has also taken 6 T20I wickets at an average of 27.33 with an economy of 8.34.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Kane Williamson is the stronger pick with an average of 69 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — David Warner or Kane Williamson?
David Warner vs Kane Williamson — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — David Warner or Kane Williamson?
What is the price difference between David Warner and Kane Williamson?
How many MOTM awards have David Warner and Kane Williamson won?
Should I pick David Warner or Kane Williamson in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, David Warner or Kane Williamson?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, David Warner or Kane Williamson?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, David Warner or Kane Williamson?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — David Warner or Kane Williamson — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.