⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
David Wiese vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
David Wiese (Rotterdam Dockers) has 601 T20I runs in 51 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 30.9 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
David Wiese vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | David Wiese | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 7 | 16 |
| Avg fantasy points | 54 | 71 |
| Best fantasy score | 127 | 214 |
| Runs | 74 | 660 |
| Strike rate | 107.2 | 130.4 |
| Fours | 7 | 63 |
| Sixes | 1 | 37 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 4 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 27 | 138 |
| Wickets | 7 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 9.85 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 0 |
| Catches | 5 | 7 |
| Total dismissals | 5 | 7 |
| Statistic | David Wiese | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 51 | 159 |
| Runs | 601 | 4231 |
| Batting average | — | 30.88 |
| Strike rate | — | 147.2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 32 |
| Wickets | 59 | 1 |
| Bowling average | 0.00 | 103.00 |
| Economy rate | — | 9.97 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 1 | 0 |
David Wiese vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: He has also taken 59 T20I wickets.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 30.88, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 103.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 71 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.