⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ellyse Perry vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ellyse Perry has the edge on the headline numbers: Ellyse Perry leads on T20I batting (2,201 runs, avg 30.1). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Ellyse Perry (Australia Women) has 2,201 T20I runs at avg 30.1 in 171 matches. Nat Sciver-Brunt (England Women) has 2,960 T20I runs at avg 29.0 in 137 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ellyse Perry vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ellyse Perry | Nat Sciver-Brunt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 11 |
| Avg fantasy points | 55 | 71 |
| Best fantasy score | 172 | 145 |
| Runs | 594 | 479 |
| Strike rate | 125.3 | 123.5 |
| Fours | 64 | 57 |
| Sixes | 11 | 6 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 4 | 4 |
| Highest score | 71 | 75 |
| Wickets | 5 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.08 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 2 | 0 |
| Catches | 4 | 5 |
| Total dismissals | 4 | 5 |
| Statistic | Ellyse Perry | Nat Sciver-Brunt |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 171 | 137 |
| Runs | 2201 | 2960 |
| Batting average | 30.15 | 29.02 |
| Strike rate | 116.9 | — |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 9 | 18 |
| Wickets | 126 | 90 |
| Bowling average | 18.92 | 23.28 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Ellyse Perry has played 171 T20Is and Nat Sciver-Brunt 137. Ellyse Perry has 2,201 runs at 30.1 (strike rate 116.9), against 2,960 at 29.0 for Nat Sciver-Brunt, so Nat Sciver-Brunt has scored more. With the ball, Ellyse Perry has 126 wickets and Nat Sciver-Brunt 90; Ellyse Perry has more wickets.
ODI. Ellyse Perry has played 165 ODIs and Nat Sciver-Brunt 129. Ellyse Perry has 4,504 runs at 48.4, against 4,354 at 46.3 for Nat Sciver-Brunt, so Ellyse Perry has scored more. Hundreds: Ellyse Perry 3, Nat Sciver-Brunt 10. Fifties: 37 and 26. With the ball, Ellyse Perry has 166 wickets and Nat Sciver-Brunt 88; Ellyse Perry has more wickets.
Test. Ellyse Perry has played 15 Tests and Nat Sciver-Brunt 12. Ellyse Perry has 1,006 runs at 59.2, against 883 at 46.5 (58.8) for Nat Sciver-Brunt, so Ellyse Perry has scored more. Hundreds: Ellyse Perry 2, Nat Sciver-Brunt 2. Fifties: 5 and 5. With the ball, Ellyse Perry has 39 wickets and Nat Sciver-Brunt 12 at 2.58; Ellyse Perry has more wickets.
International numbers up to 10 July 2026.
Ellyse Perry vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ellyse Perry has scored 2,201 T20I runs in 171 matches at an average of 30.15, with 9 half-centuries. She has also taken 126 T20I wickets at an average of 18.92.
T20I career: Nat Sciver-Brunt has scored 2,960 T20I runs in 137 matches at an average of 29.02, with 18 half-centuries. She has also taken 90 T20I wickets at an average of 23.28.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Nat Sciver-Brunt is the stronger pick with an average of 71 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
Ellyse Perry vs Nat Sciver-Brunt — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
What is the price difference between Ellyse Perry and Nat Sciver-Brunt?
How many MOTM awards have Ellyse Perry and Nat Sciver-Brunt won?
Should I pick Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
Who has more ODI runs, Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
Who has more Test runs, Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
Who has taken more Test wickets, Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Ellyse Perry or Nat Sciver-Brunt — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.