⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Georgia Wareham vs Shafali Verma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Shafali Verma has the edge on the headline numbers: Shafali Verma leads on T20I batting (3,174 runs, avg 28.9). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Georgia Wareham (Australia Women) has 406 T20I runs at avg 16.9 in 82 matches. Shafali Verma (India Women) has 3,174 T20I runs at avg 28.9 in 124 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Georgia Wareham vs Shafali Verma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Georgia Wareham | Shafali Verma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 14 |
| Avg fantasy points | 69 | 88 |
| Best fantasy score | 183 | 204 |
| Runs | 336 | 483 |
| Strike rate | 148.0 | 142.9 |
| Fours | 45 | 67 |
| Sixes | 6 | 16 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 5 |
| Highest score | 50 | 68 |
| Wickets | 18 | 7 |
| Economy rate | 5.42 | 5.85 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 3 |
| Catches | 9 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 12 | 9 |
| Statistic | Georgia Wareham | Shafali Verma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 82 | 124 |
| Runs | 406 | 3174 |
| Batting average | 16.92 | 28.85 |
| Strike rate | 143.0 | 137.8 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 1 | 20 |
| Wickets | 81 | 16 |
| Bowling average | 16.02 | 22.69 |
| Economy rate | 6.01 | 6.56 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Georgia Wareham has played 82 T20Is and Shafali Verma 124. Georgia Wareham has 406 runs at 16.9 (strike rate 143.0), against 3,174 at 28.9 (137.8) for Shafali Verma, so Shafali Verma has scored more. With the ball, Georgia Wareham has 81 wickets at an economy of 6.01 and Shafali Verma 16 at 6.56; Georgia Wareham has more wickets.
ODI. Georgia Wareham has played 51 ODIs and Shafali Verma 62. Georgia Wareham has 342 runs at 26.3 (strike rate 114.0), against 880 at 20.0 (80.8) for Shafali Verma, so Shafali Verma has scored more. With the ball, Georgia Wareham has 53 wickets at an economy of 4.39 and Shafali Verma 3 at 5.27; Georgia Wareham has more wickets.
Test. Georgia Wareham has played 1 Test and Shafali Verma 7. Georgia Wareham has 2 runs at 2.0 (strike rate 18.2), against 640 at 49.2 (73.1) for Shafali Verma, so Shafali Verma has scored more. Hundreds: Georgia Wareham 0, Shafali Verma 1. Fifties: 0 and 3.
International numbers up to 30 August 2026.
Georgia Wareham vs Shafali Verma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Georgia Wareham has scored 406 T20I runs in 82 matches at an average of 16.92, with 1 half-century. She has also taken 81 T20I wickets at an average of 16.02 with an economy of 6.01.
T20I career: Shafali Verma has scored 3,174 T20I runs in 124 matches at an average of 28.85, with 20 half-centuries. She has also taken 16 T20I wickets at an average of 22.69 with an economy of 6.56.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Shafali Verma is the stronger pick with an average of 88 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma?
Georgia Wareham vs Shafali Verma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma?
What is the price difference between Georgia Wareham and Shafali Verma?
How many MOTM awards have Georgia Wareham and Shafali Verma won?
Should I pick Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has taken more T20I wickets, Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma?
Who has more ODI runs, Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma?
Who has the better ODI strike rate?
Who has more Test runs, Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Georgia Wareham or Shafali Verma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.