⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Graeme Smith vs Rohit Sharma — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Rohit Sharma has the edge on the headline numbers: Rohit Sharma leads on T20I batting (4,231 runs, avg 32.0). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Graeme Smith (Rajasthan Royals) has 982 T20I runs at avg 31.7 in 33 matches. Rohit Sharma (India) has 4,231 T20I runs at avg 32.0 in 159 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Graeme Smith vs Rohit Sharma — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Graeme Smith | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 0 | 19 |
| Avg fantasy points | 0 | 79 |
| Best fantasy score | 0 | 214 |
| Runs | 0 | 885 |
| Strike rate | 0.0 | 126.2 |
| Fours | 0 | 85 |
| Sixes | 0 | 49 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 5 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 2 |
| Highest score | 0 | 138 |
| Catches | 0 | 9 |
| Total dismissals | 0 | 9 |
| Statistic | Graeme Smith | Rohit Sharma |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 33 | 159 |
| Runs | 982 | 4231 |
| Batting average | 31.68 | 32.05 |
| Strike rate | 127.5 | 140.9 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 5 | 32 |
| Wickets | 0 | 1 |
| Bowling average | — | 113.00 |
| Economy rate | 14.25 | 9.97 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Graeme Smith has played 33 T20Is and Rohit Sharma 159. Graeme Smith has 982 runs at 31.7 (strike rate 127.5), against 4,231 at 32.0 (140.9) for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Graeme Smith 0, Rohit Sharma 5. Fifties: 5 and 32.
ODI. Graeme Smith has played 197 ODIs and Rohit Sharma 291. Graeme Smith has 6,989 runs at 38.0 (strike rate 80.8), against 12,120 at 49.3 for Rohit Sharma, so Rohit Sharma has scored more. Hundreds: Graeme Smith 10, Rohit Sharma 35. Fifties: 47 and 63. With the ball, Graeme Smith has 18 wickets at an economy of 5.56 and Rohit Sharma 9 at 5.24; Graeme Smith has more wickets while Rohit Sharma is more economical.
Test. Graeme Smith has played 117 Tests and Rohit Sharma 67. Graeme Smith has 9,265 runs at 48.3 (strike rate 59.7), against 4,301 at 40.6 (57.1) for Rohit Sharma, so Graeme Smith has scored more. Hundreds: Graeme Smith 27, Rohit Sharma 12. Fifties: 38 and 18. With the ball, Graeme Smith has 8 wickets at an economy of 3.74 and Rohit Sharma 2 at 3.51; Graeme Smith has more wickets while Rohit Sharma is more economical.
International numbers up to 19 July 2026.
Graeme Smith vs Rohit Sharma — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Graeme Smith has scored 982 T20I runs in 33 matches at an average of 31.68, with 5 half-centuries.
T20I career: Rohit Sharma has scored 4,231 T20I runs in 159 matches at an average of 32.05, with 5 centuries. He has also taken 1 T20I wickets at an average of 113.00 with an economy of 9.97.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rohit Sharma is the stronger pick with an average of 79 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma?
Graeme Smith vs Rohit Sharma — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma?
What is the price difference between Graeme Smith and Rohit Sharma?
How many MOTM awards have Graeme Smith and Rohit Sharma won?
Should I pick Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma?
Who has the better T20I strike rate?
Who has more ODI runs, Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma?
Who has taken more ODI wickets, Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma?
Who has more Test runs, Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Graeme Smith or Rohit Sharma — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.