⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Harry Brook vs Sikandar Raza: Who Is Better? International Stats Comparison
Harry Brook has the edge on the headline numbers: Harry Brook leads on T20I batting (1,702 runs, avg 36.2). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Harry Brook (England) has 1,702 T20I runs at avg 36.2 in 71 matches. Sikandar Raza (Zimbabwe) has 2,740 T20I runs at avg 25.6 in 123 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Harry Brook vs Sikandar Raza — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Harry Brook | Sikandar Raza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 80 | 63 |
| Best fantasy score | 212 | 169 |
| Runs | 894 | 452 |
| Strike rate | 129.8 | 97.4 |
| Fours | 81 | 37 |
| Sixes | 37 | 12 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 6 | 2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Highest score | 114 | 81 |
| Wickets | 0 | 14 |
| Economy rate | 4.00 | 6.37 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 2 |
| Catches | 18 | 10 |
| Total dismissals | 18 | 12 |
| Statistic | Harry Brook | Sikandar Raza |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 71 | 123 |
| Runs | 1702 | 2740 |
| Batting average | 36.21 | 25.61 |
| Strike rate | — | 136.3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 2 | 1 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 8 | 15 |
| Wickets | 0 | 103 |
| Bowling average | — | 24.06 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.08 |
| Five-wicket hauls | 0 | 1 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Harry Brook has played 71 T20Is and Sikandar Raza 123. Harry Brook has 1,702 runs at 36.2, against 2,740 at 25.6 (136.3) for Sikandar Raza, so Sikandar Raza has scored more. Hundreds: Harry Brook 2, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 8 and 15. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 103 wickets at an economy of 7.08, while Harry Brook has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Harry Brook has played 44 ODIs and Sikandar Raza 128. Harry Brook has 1,530 runs at 38.3, against 3,707 at 36.7 (87.8) for Sikandar Raza, so Sikandar Raza has scored more. Hundreds: Harry Brook 3, Sikandar Raza 6. Fifties: 8 and 20. Sikandar Raza also bowls: 76 wickets at an economy of 4.96, while Harry Brook has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Harry Brook has played 41 Tests and Sikandar Raza 18. Harry Brook has 3,610 runs at 53.1, against 1,120 at 31.1 (54.6) for Sikandar Raza, so Harry Brook has scored more. Hundreds: Harry Brook 10, Sikandar Raza 1. Fifties: 20 and 8. With the ball, Harry Brook has 1 wickets at an economy of 4.24 and Sikandar Raza 34 at 3.30; Sikandar Raza has more wickets.
International numbers up to 1 September 2026.
Harry Brook vs Sikandar Raza — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Harry Brook has scored 1,702 T20I runs in 71 matches at an average of 36.21, with 2 centuries.
T20I career: Sikandar Raza has scored 2,740 T20I runs in 123 matches at an average of 25.61, with 1 century. He has also taken 103 T20I wickets at an average of 24.06 with an economy of 7.08.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Harry Brook is the stronger pick with an average of 80 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza?
Harry Brook vs Sikandar Raza — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza?
What is the price difference between Harry Brook and Sikandar Raza?
How many MOTM awards have Harry Brook and Sikandar Raza won?
Should I pick Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza?
Who has more ODI runs, Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza?
Who has more Test runs, Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Harry Brook or Sikandar Raza — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.