⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Ishan Kishan vs Mitchell Santner — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Ishan Kishan has the edge on the headline numbers: Ishan Kishan leads on T20I batting (1,801 runs, avg 31.1). Full T20I, ODI, Test and IPL stats are below.
Ishan Kishan (India) has 1,801 T20I runs at avg 31.1 in 62 matches. Mitchell Santner (Edinburgh Castle Rockers) has 1,108 T20I runs at avg 20.5 in 138 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Ishan Kishan vs Mitchell Santner — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Ishan Kishan | Mitchell Santner |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 20 | 20 |
| Avg fantasy points | 55 | 65 |
| Best fantasy score | 151 | 207 |
| Runs | 565 | 298 |
| Strike rate | 141.6 | 151.3 |
| Fours | 59 | 25 |
| Sixes | 17 | 12 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 3 | 1 |
| Highest score | 81 | 52 |
| Wickets | 0 | 18 |
| Economy rate | 0.00 | 6.70 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 0 | 5 |
| Catches | 16 | 8 |
| Total dismissals | 20 | 9 |
| Statistic | Ishan Kishan | Mitchell Santner |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 62 | 138 |
| Runs | 1801 | 1108 |
| Batting average | 31.05 | 20.52 |
| Strike rate | — | 133.2 |
| Centuries (100+) | 1 | 0 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 13 | 2 |
| Wickets | 0 | 142 |
| Bowling average | — | 23.33 |
| Economy rate | — | 7.17 |
📋 Format by format
T20I. Ishan Kishan has played 62 T20Is and Mitchell Santner 138. Ishan Kishan has 1,801 runs at 31.1, against 1,108 at 20.5 (133.2) for Mitchell Santner, so Ishan Kishan has scored more. Hundreds: Ishan Kishan 1, Mitchell Santner 0. Fifties: 13 and 2. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 142 wickets at an economy of 7.17, while Ishan Kishan has not taken a T20I wicket.
ODI. Ishan Kishan has played 32 ODIs and Mitchell Santner 129. Ishan Kishan has 1,107 runs at 42.6, against 1,648 at 27.0 (92.4) for Mitchell Santner, so Mitchell Santner has scored more. Hundreds: Ishan Kishan 2, Mitchell Santner 0. Fifties: 7 and 3. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 139 wickets, while Ishan Kishan has not taken a ODI wicket.
Test. Ishan Kishan has played 2 Tests and Mitchell Santner 33. Ishan Kishan has 78 runs at 78.0 (strike rate 85.7), against 1,089 at 24.8 (47.0) for Mitchell Santner, so Mitchell Santner has scored more. Hundreds: Ishan Kishan 0, Mitchell Santner 1. Fifties: 1 and 4. Mitchell Santner also bowls: 80 wickets at an economy of 2.86, while Ishan Kishan has not taken a Test wicket.
International numbers up to 26 July 2026.
Ishan Kishan vs Mitchell Santner — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Ishan Kishan has scored 1,801 T20I runs in 62 matches at an average of 31.05, with 1 century.
T20I career: Mitchell Santner has scored 1,108 T20I runs in 138 matches at an average of 20.52, with 2 half-centuries. He has also taken 142 T20I wickets at an average of 23.33 with an economy of 7.17.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Mitchell Santner is the stronger pick with an average of 65 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Who has better fantasy stats — Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner?
Ishan Kishan vs Mitchell Santner — who is a better fantasy captain?
Who has a better strike rate — Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner?
What is the price difference between Ishan Kishan and Mitchell Santner?
How many MOTM awards have Ishan Kishan and Mitchell Santner won?
Should I pick Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner in my fantasy XI?
Who has more T20I runs, Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner?
Who has more ODI runs, Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner?
Who has more Test runs, Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner?
SETTLE IT IN A GAME
Numbers only get you so far. Pick a side — Ishan Kishan or Mitchell Santner — and see who actually delivers.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.