⚔️HEAD-TO-HEAD
Jacob Duffy vs Rishabh Pant — International Fantasy Cricket Stats Comparison
Jacob Duffy (New Zealand) has 40 T20I runs at avg 8.0 in 47 matches. Rishabh Pant (Lucknow Super Giants) has 1,142 T20I runs at avg 22.4 in 72 matches. Head-to-head batting, bowling & fielding across T20I, ODI & Test.
Full season · batting · bowling · fielding · MOTM · form
Jacob Duffy vs Rishabh Pant — Stat Comparison Table
Head-to-head numbers at a glance. Higher value is highlighted in green (lower is better for economy and bowling/batting averages).
| Statistic | Jacob Duffy | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 17 |
| Avg fantasy points | 43 | 62 |
| Best fantasy score | 129 | 197 |
| Runs | 6 | 561 |
| Strike rate | 35.3 | 98.9 |
| Fours | 0 | 54 |
| Sixes | 0 | 19 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Centuries (100+) | 0 | 1 |
| Highest score | 5 | 105 |
| Wickets | 13 | 0 |
| Economy rate | 7.33 | 0.00 |
| Best spell (wkts) | 3 | 0 |
| Catches | 1 | 15 |
| Total dismissals | 1 | 20 |
| Statistic | Jacob Duffy | Rishabh Pant |
|---|---|---|
| Matches | 47 | 72 |
| Runs | 40 | 1142 |
| Batting average | 8.00 | 22.39 |
| Strike rate | 97.6 | 125.5 |
| Half-centuries (50+) | 0 | 3 |
| Wickets | 61 | 0 |
| Bowling average | 20.10 | — |
| Economy rate | 8.05 | — |
Jacob Duffy vs Rishabh Pant — T20I is a highly-debated cricket matchup. Below are their T20I career highlights.
T20I career: Jacob Duffy has scored 40 T20I runs in 47 matches at an average of 8.00. He has also taken 61 T20I wickets at an average of 20.10 with an economy of 8.05.
T20I career: Rishabh Pant has scored 1,142 T20I runs in 72 matches at an average of 22.39, with 3 half-centuries.
Fantasy Impact: From a pure fantasy perspective, Rishabh Pant is the stronger pick with an average of 62 pts per game in recent fantasy cricket. Always check the playing XI and toss before locking in your captain.
Stats are sourced from international career records. Compare more players using our Player Comparison Tool.
Found an issue or have a suggestion? Contact us — we’d love to hear from you.